The fundamental frequencies of our own voice

Own actions send a corollary discharge (CD) signal, that is a copy of the planned motor programme, to sensory-specific brain areas to suppress the anticipated sensory response, providing a neural basis for the sense of self. When we speak, the sensory consequences of the fundamental frequency ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext></mml:msub> </mml:math> ) of our own voice, generated by vocal fold vibrations, are suppressed. However, due to bone/air conduction filtering effects, the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext></mml:msub> </mml:math> we self-generate is measurably different from the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext></mml:msub> </mml:math> we subjectively perceive as defining our own voice. Using an auditory change deafness paradigm, we parametrically tested the sensitivity to auditory change in the frequency neighbourhoods of objective and subjective own voice pitches and found that participants experience change deafness for both to a similar extent, relative to a control pitch condition. We conclude that when we listen attentively, we are likely to filter out small pitch changes in the vicinity of our own objective and subjective voice <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext></mml:msub> </mml:math> , possibly as a long-term consequence of speaking-induced suppression mechanisms integrated with individual, perceptual bodily priors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241081
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The fundamental frequencies of our own voice

Yves Boubenec, Christian J. Fiebach, R. Muralikrishnan, Alessandro Tavano et al.
1 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Neuroscience and Music Perception
1.43
article

The fundamental frequencies of our own voice

Yves Boubenec, Christian J. Fiebach, R. Muralikrishnan, Alessandro Tavano, Hakam Neamaalkassis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Own actions send a corollary discharge (CD) signal, that is a copy of the planned motor programme, to sensory-specific brain areas to suppress the anticipated sensory response, providing a neural basis for the sense of self. When we speak, the sensory consequences of the fundamental frequency ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext></mml:msub> </mml:math> ) of our own voice, generated by vocal fold vibrations, are suppressed. However, due to bone/air conduction filtering effects, the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext></mml:msub> </mml:math> we self-generate is measurably different from the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext></mml:msub> </mml:math> we subjectively perceive as defining our own voice. Using an auditory change deafness paradigm, we parametrically tested the sensitivity to auditory change in the frequency neighbourhoods of objective and subjective own voice pitches and found that participants experience change deafness for both to a similar extent, relative to a control pitch condition. We conclude that when we listen attentively, we are likely to filter out small pitch changes in the vicinity of our own objective and subjective voice <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext></mml:msub> </mml:math> , possibly as a long-term consequence of speaking-induced suppression mechanisms integrated with individual, perceptual bodily priors.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 12(2)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (DE), École Normale Supérieure (BI)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Institut Universitaire de France
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.