A structural mean modeling Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the lifecourse effect of adiposity: applied and methodological considerations

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a technique that uses genetic variation to address causal questions about how modifiable exposures influence health. For some time-varying phenotypes, genetic effects may have differential importance at different periods in the lifecourse. MR studies often employ conventional instrumental variable (IV) methods designed to estimate average lifetime effects. Recently, several extensions of MR have been proposed to investigate time-varying effects, including structural mean models (SMMs). SMMs exploit IVs through g-estimation and circumvent some of the parametric assumptions required by other MR methods. In this study, we applied g-estimation of SMMs within an MR framework to estimate the period effects of adiposity measured at two life stages, childhood and adulthood, on cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and breast cancer. We found persistent period effects of higher adulthood adiposity on increased risk of CVD and T2D. Higher childhood adiposity had a protective period effect on breast cancer risk. We compared this approach with an inverse variance weighted multivariable MR method, which also uses multiple IVs to assess time-varying effects but relies on a different set of assumptions. We highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach and conclude by emphasizing the importance of underlying methodological assumptions in the application of MR to lifecourse research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf029
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A structural mean modeling Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the lifecourse effect of adiposity: applied and methodological considerations

Nicole M. Warrington, George Davey Smith, Jon Heron, Tom G. Richardson et al.
3 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
5.45
article

A structural mean modeling Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the lifecourse effect of adiposity: applied and methodological considerations

Nicole M. Warrington, George Davey Smith, Jon Heron, Tom G. Richardson, Vanessa Didelez, Grace Marion Power, Eleanor Sanderson, Tom Palmer, Kate Tilling
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a technique that uses genetic variation to address causal questions about how modifiable exposures influence health. For some time-varying phenotypes, genetic effects may have differential importance at different periods in the lifecourse. MR studies often employ conventional instrumental variable (IV) methods designed to estimate average lifetime effects. Recently, several extensions of MR have been proposed to investigate time-varying effects, including structural mean models (SMMs). SMMs exploit IVs through g-estimation and circumvent some of the parametric assumptions required by other MR methods. In this study, we applied g-estimation of SMMs within an MR framework to estimate the period effects of adiposity measured at two life stages, childhood and adulthood, on cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and breast cancer. We found persistent period effects of higher adulthood adiposity on increased risk of CVD and T2D. Higher childhood adiposity had a protective period effect on breast cancer risk. We compared this approach with an inverse variance weighted multivariable MR method, which also uses multiple IVs to assess time-varying effects but relies on a different set of assumptions. We highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach and conclude by emphasizing the importance of underlying methodological assumptions in the application of MR to lifecourse research.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 195(1)
Translational Research Institute (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Hochschule Bremen (DE), University of Bremen (DE), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS (DE), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB), MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB)
Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.