Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of heat polymerized polymethylmethacrylate denture base material reinforced with silanized titanium dioxide nanoparticles and silanized aluminium oxide nanoparticles–An in vitro study

: he denture base, which supports artificial teeth and rests on the oral mucosa, is commonly made from Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), introduced by Dr. Walter Wright in 1937. PMMA is popular for its ease of processing, low cost, light weight, and aesthetic appeal, but it has drawbacks such as low mechanical strength, brittleness, and a high coefficient of thermal expansion, leading to fractures, particularly under functional stress. Research has focused on incorporating metal oxide nanoparticles into PMMA to improve its mechanical properties and antimicrobial activity. To assess and compare the flexural strength of heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base material reinforced with 1% silanized aluminium oxide nanoparticles and 3% silanized titanium dioxide nanoparticles to that of heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base material. : Total 90 specimens were prepared, 30 each for PMM denture base material without reinforcement (group C), PMM reinforced with 1% Aluminium oxide nanoparticles (group A) and PMM reinforced with 3% Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (group T) respectively. Flexural strength was tested with universal testing machine at a 5mm/minute crosshead speed. Flexural strength testing on specimens showed a highly significant difference across the three groups (p < 0.0001). Significant differences were found between Group C and both Group A (p < 0.000001) and Group T (p < 0.000001), while no significant difference was observed between Group A and Group T (p = 0.647). Reinforcement with nanoparticles increased the flexural strength, with 1% silanized aluminium oxide nanoparticles showing a highly significant improvement. However, no significant difference was found between specimens reinforced with 1% silanized aluminium oxide (Group A) and 3% silanized titanium dioxide nanoparticles (Group T).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.aprd.2025.006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of heat polymerized polymethylmethacrylate denture base material reinforced with silanized titanium dioxide nanoparticles and silanized aluminium oxide nanoparticles–An in vitro study

Anagha Waghmare, Jayashree Joshi, Saee Deshpande, Neelam Pande et al.
1 citations
IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of heat polymerized polymethylmethacrylate denture base material reinforced with silanized titanium dioxide nanoparticles and silanized aluminium oxide nanoparticles–An in vitro study

Anagha Waghmare, Jayashree Joshi, Saee Deshpande, Neelam Pande, Srushti Ravindra Ghagas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

: he denture base, which supports artificial teeth and rests on the oral mucosa, is commonly made from Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), introduced by Dr. Walter Wright in 1937. PMMA is popular for its ease of processing, low cost, light weight, and aesthetic appeal, but it has drawbacks such as low mechanical strength, brittleness, and a high coefficient of thermal expansion, leading to fractures, particularly under functional stress. Research has focused on incorporating metal oxide nanoparticles into PMMA to improve its mechanical properties and antimicrobial activity. To assess and compare the flexural strength of heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base material reinforced with 1% silanized aluminium oxide nanoparticles and 3% silanized titanium dioxide nanoparticles to that of heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base material. : Total 90 specimens were prepared, 30 each for PMM denture base material without reinforcement (group C), PMM reinforced with 1% Aluminium oxide nanoparticles (group A) and PMM reinforced with 3% Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (group T) respectively. Flexural strength was tested with universal testing machine at a 5mm/minute crosshead speed. Flexural strength testing on specimens showed a highly significant difference across the three groups (p < 0.0001). Significant differences were found between Group C and both Group A (p < 0.000001) and Group T (p < 0.000001), while no significant difference was observed between Group A and Group T (p = 0.647). Reinforcement with nanoparticles increased the flexural strength, with 1% silanized aluminium oxide nanoparticles showing a highly significant improvement. However, no significant difference was found between specimens reinforced with 1% silanized aluminium oxide (Group A) and 3% silanized titanium dioxide nanoparticles (Group T).

IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative DentistryVol. 11(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of heat polymerized polymethylmethacrylate denture base material reinforced with silanized titanium dioxide nanoparticles and silanized aluminium oxide nanoparticles–An in vitro study — Anagha Waghmare, Jayashree Joshi, et al. · IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS