Validation of enteric methane emissions by cattle estimated from mathematical models using data from in vivo experiments

Several authors have developed equations to estimate methane (CH4) emissions by cattle according to variables such as dry matter and nutrient intake, live weight, or weight gain. Mathematical models using these variables show a large variability of results, being necessary to identify those which provide more precise and accurate predictions. For this reason, the objective of this study was to validate enteric CH4 emissions estimated from mathematical models through a comparison with a database of CH4 emissions obtained from cattle experiments carried out in tropical regions. A database of 495 individual cattle CH4 emissions data (g day-1) obtained from 19 studies in three tropical Latin American countries was built for this study. Results showed that mathematical models developed for cattle in tropical production systems overestimated CH4 emissions when they were compared with our database. The mathematical model with higher precision and accuracy was the one that included dry matter intake and organic matter digestibility in the equation (Equation 7. R2=0.34, Cb=0.94, CCC=0.55, RMSE=60.8%, r=0.58), followed by models that included neutral detergent fiber intake data (Equation 5). Our data did not show a relationship between CH4 emissions and gross energy intake or live weight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v47i1.69328
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of enteric methane emissions by cattle estimated from mathematical models using data from in vivo experiments

María Denisse Montoya-Flores, Jacobo Arango, Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero, Juan Carlos Kú-Vera et al.
1 citations
Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
0.57
article

Validation of enteric methane emissions by cattle estimated from mathematical models using data from in vivo experiments

María Denisse Montoya-Flores, Jacobo Arango, Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero, Juan Carlos Kú-Vera, Olga Lucía Mayorga Mogollón, Eduardo Fuentes, Jeyder I. Arceo-Castillo, Carlos Gómez-Bravo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Several authors have developed equations to estimate methane (CH4) emissions by cattle according to variables such as dry matter and nutrient intake, live weight, or weight gain. Mathematical models using these variables show a large variability of results, being necessary to identify those which provide more precise and accurate predictions. For this reason, the objective of this study was to validate enteric CH4 emissions estimated from mathematical models through a comparison with a database of CH4 emissions obtained from cattle experiments carried out in tropical regions. A database of 495 individual cattle CH4 emissions data (g day-1) obtained from 19 studies in three tropical Latin American countries was built for this study. Results showed that mathematical models developed for cattle in tropical production systems overestimated CH4 emissions when they were compared with our database. The mathematical model with higher precision and accuracy was the one that included dry matter intake and organic matter digestibility in the equation (Equation 7. R2=0.34, Cb=0.94, CCC=0.55, RMSE=60.8%, r=0.58), followed by models that included neutral detergent fiber intake data (Equation 5). Our data did not show a relationship between CH4 emissions and gross energy intake or live weight.

Acta Scientiarum Animal SciencesVol. 47(1)
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (LA), Autonomous University of Yucatán (MX), International Center for Tropical Agriculture (KE), Forestry Research Institute (UZ), Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research - AGROSAVIA (CO), Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (PE)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación, CYTED Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.