Comparative analysis of accuracy of SLA and DMLS technologies for cast partial denture frameworks using metrology software

Advanced manufacturing techniques like CAD/CAM and 3D printing have revolutionized dental prosthetics, offering improved precision, efficiency, and accessibility. The accuracy and precision of cast partial dentures significantly affect patient outcomes. To compare the trueness and precision of stereolithography (SLA) and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) in fabricating Cast Partial Denture (CPD) frameworks. A partially edentulous mandibular replica was scanned to create a master STL file. Using CAD software, 32 frameworks were designed and produced: 16 using DMLS and 16 using SLA. The frameworks were digitized using a high-precision scanner and compared to the original CAD design using 3D analysis software. Five Areas of Interest (AOIs) were identified: the lingual plate, right and left I-bars, and right and left proximal plates. Gap distances and Root Mean Square (RMS) values were calculated for statistical analysis. No statistically significant differences were found between DMLS and SLA techniques across the five AOIs (p > 0.05). RMS values for DMLS ranged from 0.0290 mm to 0.0348 mm, whereas SLA values ranged from 0.0337 mm to 0.0387 mm. The right proximal plate showed a marginally non-significant difference (p = 0.0560), favoring DMLS. Both DMLS and SLA techniques demonstrated comparable accuracy in producing cast partial denture frameworks across all examined areas. This study provides valuable insights for dental professionals in selecting manufacturing techniques for CPD frameworks by considering factors such as cost and material properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.aprd.2025.010
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of accuracy of SLA and DMLS technologies for cast partial denture frameworks using metrology software

Mallikarjun H. Doddamani, Rajesh Suhas Swami
IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparative analysis of accuracy of SLA and DMLS technologies for cast partial denture frameworks using metrology software

Mallikarjun H. Doddamani, Rajesh Suhas Swami
article en

Abstract

Advanced manufacturing techniques like CAD/CAM and 3D printing have revolutionized dental prosthetics, offering improved precision, efficiency, and accessibility. The accuracy and precision of cast partial dentures significantly affect patient outcomes. To compare the trueness and precision of stereolithography (SLA) and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) in fabricating Cast Partial Denture (CPD) frameworks. A partially edentulous mandibular replica was scanned to create a master STL file. Using CAD software, 32 frameworks were designed and produced: 16 using DMLS and 16 using SLA. The frameworks were digitized using a high-precision scanner and compared to the original CAD design using 3D analysis software. Five Areas of Interest (AOIs) were identified: the lingual plate, right and left I-bars, and right and left proximal plates. Gap distances and Root Mean Square (RMS) values were calculated for statistical analysis. No statistically significant differences were found between DMLS and SLA techniques across the five AOIs (p > 0.05). RMS values for DMLS ranged from 0.0290 mm to 0.0348 mm, whereas SLA values ranged from 0.0337 mm to 0.0387 mm. The right proximal plate showed a marginally non-significant difference (p = 0.0560), favoring DMLS. Both DMLS and SLA techniques demonstrated comparable accuracy in producing cast partial denture frameworks across all examined areas. This study provides valuable insights for dental professionals in selecting manufacturing techniques for CPD frameworks by considering factors such as cost and material properties.

IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative DentistryVol. 11(1)
KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.