On the conversion of plastic work into heat in metals

This paper provides a comprehensive review of the methodologies employed to determine the fraction of plastic work converted into heat in the deformation of metals, known as the Taylor–Quinney coefficient (TQC). This review delves into the experimental, analytical and numerical methods found in the existing literature, highlighting their respective advantages and shortcomings, and reveals a notable variation in the reported values of the TQC of metals and how these values change with strain, strain rate, loading mode and microstructure. Despite this variation, the practice of considering the TQC as a constant between 0.85 and 0.95 is still found in the literature. The review identifies critical research gaps, emphasizing the scarcity of studies investigating the TQC at extremely high strains and strain rates. In addition, the paper highlights the interchangeability of using an integral and differential TQC without clear distinctions and the absence of objective conclusions supported by statistical significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2024.0139
Citations
2
Primary Topic
High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the conversion of plastic work into heat in metals

Odai Nassar
2 citations
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
1.04
article

On the conversion of plastic work into heat in metals

Odai Nassar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of the methodologies employed to determine the fraction of plastic work converted into heat in the deformation of metals, known as the Taylor–Quinney coefficient (TQC). This review delves into the experimental, analytical and numerical methods found in the existing literature, highlighting their respective advantages and shortcomings, and reveals a notable variation in the reported values of the TQC of metals and how these values change with strain, strain rate, loading mode and microstructure. Despite this variation, the practice of considering the TQC as a constant between 0.85 and 0.95 is still found in the literature. The review identifies critical research gaps, emphasizing the scarcity of studies investigating the TQC at extremely high strains and strain rates. In addition, the paper highlights the interchangeability of using an integral and differential TQC without clear distinctions and the absence of objective conclusions supported by statistical significance.

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 481(2308)
Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the conversion of plastic work into heat in metals — Odai Nassar · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS