A general framework quantifying variability in spatial inhomogeneity of global precipitation and its contribution

The spatial inhomogeneity of changes in global precipitation, which is directly related to extreme flooding or drought events, represents a significant feature of climate change. To date, limited studies quantified the spatial inhomogeneity of global precipitation and its long-term change. Aiming at solving the above challenge, this study introduces a novel but simple methodological framework that is able to (1) quantify the spatial inhomogeneity of global precipitation and its variability, (2) estimate contributions of different precipitation intensities and (3) assess contributions of different regions. In this framework, the spatial inhomogeneity is quantified by the spatial variance of gridded precipitation normalized by the global mean precipitation, namely spatial coefficient of variation (SCV). Then, the spatial probability density function (PDF) of precipitation intensity is introduced to identify contributions of different precipitation intervals that lead to changes in global precipitation inhomogeneity. Finally, the global inhomogeneity can be decomposed into intra-regional and inter-regional inhomogeneity components to estimate the contributions from different regions. The result shows that the inhomogeneity of global annual precipitation has increased consistently across multiple datasets in the satellite era (1979–2021), attributed to the increasing area of both extremely high and low precipitation. Based on the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP V2.3) dataset, the increase in inhomogeneity of global annual precipitation is primarily contributed by the intra-regional inhomogeneity component of Northern Hemispheric tropical ocean (+ 60.2%) and Southern Hemispheric tropical ocean (+ 40.3%), and is partly offset by the inter-regional inhomogeneity component of Northern Hemispheric mid-latitude ocean (− 4.5%). This study demonstrates how the spatial inhomogeneity of global precipitation can be easily estimated, which is implications for quantifying, monitoring, and understanding changes in climate extremes. Our framework offers a tool for dataset or model assessment, particularly useful for the regions susceptible to extreme precipitation events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate Dynamics
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07580-w
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A general framework quantifying variability in spatial inhomogeneity of global precipitation and its contribution

Shifei Tu, Jianjun Xu, Miaohong He, Jeremy Cheuk‐Hin Leung et al.
4 citations
Climate Dynamics
Climate variability and models
4.42
article

A general framework quantifying variability in spatial inhomogeneity of global precipitation and its contribution

Shifei Tu, Jianjun Xu, Miaohong He, Jeremy Cheuk‐Hin Leung, Hoiio Kong, Banglin Zhang, Chunlei Liu, Shengyuan Liu, Meiying Zheng
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The spatial inhomogeneity of changes in global precipitation, which is directly related to extreme flooding or drought events, represents a significant feature of climate change. To date, limited studies quantified the spatial inhomogeneity of global precipitation and its long-term change. Aiming at solving the above challenge, this study introduces a novel but simple methodological framework that is able to (1) quantify the spatial inhomogeneity of global precipitation and its variability, (2) estimate contributions of different precipitation intensities and (3) assess contributions of different regions. In this framework, the spatial inhomogeneity is quantified by the spatial variance of gridded precipitation normalized by the global mean precipitation, namely spatial coefficient of variation (SCV). Then, the spatial probability density function (PDF) of precipitation intensity is introduced to identify contributions of different precipitation intervals that lead to changes in global precipitation inhomogeneity. Finally, the global inhomogeneity can be decomposed into intra-regional and inter-regional inhomogeneity components to estimate the contributions from different regions. The result shows that the inhomogeneity of global annual precipitation has increased consistently across multiple datasets in the satellite era (1979–2021), attributed to the increasing area of both extremely high and low precipitation. Based on the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP V2.3) dataset, the increase in inhomogeneity of global annual precipitation is primarily contributed by the intra-regional inhomogeneity component of Northern Hemispheric tropical ocean (+ 60.2%) and Southern Hemispheric tropical ocean (+ 40.3%), and is partly offset by the inter-regional inhomogeneity component of Northern Hemispheric mid-latitude ocean (− 4.5%). This study demonstrates how the spatial inhomogeneity of global precipitation can be easily estimated, which is implications for quantifying, monitoring, and understanding changes in climate extremes. Our framework offers a tool for dataset or model assessment, particularly useful for the regions susceptible to extreme precipitation events.

Climate DynamicsVol. 63(2)
China Meteorological Administration (CN), National University of Defense Technology (CN), Hainan Marine Monitoring and Forecasting Center (CN), City University of Macau (MO), Lanzhou University (CN), Guangdong Ocean University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National University of Defense Technology, Guangdong Province Introduction of Innovative R&D Team, Key Programme, Major Research Plan
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate variability and models
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.