The First International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Standard Dataset for Reporting Outcomes in Heart Valve Disease: Moving From Device- to Patient-Centered Outcomes

Background Globally significant variation in treatment and course of heart valve disease (HVD) exists, and outcome measurement is procedure-focused instead of patient-focused. This article describes the development of a patient-related (International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement) standard set of outcomes and case mix to be measured in patients with HVD. Methods A multisociety working group was formed that included patient representatives and representatives from scientific cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery societies that publish current guidelines for HVD. The standard set was developed to monitor the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment with either a surgical or transcatheter procedure. Candidate clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and case mix were identified through benchmark analyses and systematic reviews. Using an online modified Delphi process, the working group voted on final outcomes/case mix and corresponding definition. Results Patients with aortic/mitral/tricuspid valve disease or root/ascending aorta >40 mm were included in the standard set. Patients entered the dataset when the diagnosis of HVD was established, allowing outcome measurement in the preprocedural, periprocedural, and postprocedural phases of patients’ lives. The working group defined 5 outcome domains: vital status, patient-reported outcomes, progression of disease, cardiac function and durability, and complications of treatment. Subsequently, 16 outcome measures, including 2 patient-reported outcomes, were selected to be tracked in patients with HVD. Case-mix variables included demographic factors, demographic variables, echocardiographic variables, heart catheterization variables, and specific details on aortic/mitral/tricuspid valves and their specific interventions. Conclusions Through a unique collaborative effort between patients and cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery societies, a standard set of measures for HVD was developed. This dataset focuses on outcome measurement regardless of treatment, moving from procedure- to patient-centered outcomes. Implementation of this dataset will facilitate global standardization of outcome measurement, allow meaningful comparison between health care systems and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines, and eventually improve patient care for those experiencing HVD worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Heart Valve Society
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30494826241296677
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The First International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Standard Dataset for Reporting Outcomes in Heart Valve Disease: Moving From Device- to Patient-Centered Outcomes

Ourania Preventza, Gry Dahle, Rafael Sádaba, Vinod H. Thourani et al.
1 citations
Journal of the Heart Valve Society
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.40
article

The First International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Standard Dataset for Reporting Outcomes in Heart Valve Disease: Moving From Device- to Patient-Centered Outcomes

Ourania Preventza, Gry Dahle, Rafael Sádaba, Vinod H. Thourani, Philippe Pîbarot, Marta Sitges, Hani Jneid, Vera H. Rigolin, Erwan Donal, Ruchika Meel, Molly Szerlip, Philip M. Holmes, Andreas Zuckermann, Pinak Shah, Frieda Sossi, Daniel Colgan, Kevin M. Veen, Bart Meuris, Andria Joseph, Zofia Das‐Gupta, Rebecca Tung Hahn, Paula Blancarte Jaber, Jolanda Kluin, Husam H. Balkhy, Emmanuel Lansac, Faisal G. Bakaeen, Johanna J.M. Takkenberg, Evaldas Girdauskas, Suleman Aktaa, Wil Woan, John Stott, Aubrey Almeida, Elena Aikawa, Wilson Y. Szeto, Frederick J. Schoen, Silvana Medica
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Globally significant variation in treatment and course of heart valve disease (HVD) exists, and outcome measurement is procedure-focused instead of patient-focused. This article describes the development of a patient-related (International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement) standard set of outcomes and case mix to be measured in patients with HVD. Methods A multisociety working group was formed that included patient representatives and representatives from scientific cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery societies that publish current guidelines for HVD. The standard set was developed to monitor the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment with either a surgical or transcatheter procedure. Candidate clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and case mix were identified through benchmark analyses and systematic reviews. Using an online modified Delphi process, the working group voted on final outcomes/case mix and corresponding definition. Results Patients with aortic/mitral/tricuspid valve disease or root/ascending aorta >40 mm were included in the standard set. Patients entered the dataset when the diagnosis of HVD was established, allowing outcome measurement in the preprocedural, periprocedural, and postprocedural phases of patients’ lives. The working group defined 5 outcome domains: vital status, patient-reported outcomes, progression of disease, cardiac function and durability, and complications of treatment. Subsequently, 16 outcome measures, including 2 patient-reported outcomes, were selected to be tracked in patients with HVD. Case-mix variables included demographic factors, demographic variables, echocardiographic variables, heart catheterization variables, and specific details on aortic/mitral/tricuspid valves and their specific interventions. Conclusions Through a unique collaborative effort between patients and cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery societies, a standard set of measures for HVD was developed. This dataset focuses on outcome measurement regardless of treatment, moving from procedure- to patient-centered outcomes. Implementation of this dataset will facilitate global standardization of outcome measurement, allow meaningful comparison between health care systems and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines, and eventually improve patient care for those experiencing HVD worldwide.

Journal of the Heart Valve SocietyVol. 1(1)
Northwestern University (US), Oslo University Hospital (NO), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Valve (United States) (US), Harvard University (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Montreal Heart Institute (CA), Monash Medical Centre (AU), Erasmus MC (NL), University Hospital Augsburg (DE), Sorbonne Université (FR), University of Chicago (US), Baylor Medical Center at Garland (US), Heart Hospital Baylor Plano (US), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR), University of Virginia (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Columbia University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Universidad de Navarra (ES), University of Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
American Heart Association, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific Corporation, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Intuitive Surgical, Societat Catalana de Cardiologia, Abiomed, Association Chirurgicale Pour Le Développement et L'Amélioration des Techniques de Dépistage et de Traitement des Maladies Cardio-vasculaires, Siemens Healthineers, Medela, Abbott Vascular, Philippine Rice Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.