Contrastive Analysis of English and Urdu Languages

This research study undertakes an exploratory and descriptive analysis to identify the differences and similarities between pronouns in the English and Urdu languages. Utilizing Lado’s Model of contrastive analysis (1957), the study systematically compares the structures of both languages, aiming to uncover how each handles pronouns across various categories: demonstrative, personal, possessive, reflexive, indefinite, and relative. Data is derived from intermediate-level grammar guides for both languages, supplemented by additional resources for thorough analysis. The findings reveal distinct patterns in pronoun usage, highlighting significant differences in gender representation, pluralization, and cultural nuances. For instance, English pronouns exhibit clear gender distinctions, while Urdu employs the same terms regardless of gender. Additionally, Urdu pronouns reflect varying degrees of formality and intimacy, which lack direct equivalents in English. These insights are critical for understanding the challenges faced by Urdu speakers learning English and can inform educators and curriculum developers in creating tailored instructional strategies. Overall, this study bridges theoretical frameworks with practical applications, contributing to the field of applied linguistics and enhancing the learning experience for students. Keywords: Contrastive analysis, English, Urdu, Pronouns

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GUMAN
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63075/guman.v7i3.854
Primary Topic
Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrastive Analysis of English and Urdu Languages

Javed Iqbal, Muhammad Ejaz, Waqar Saleem Rana
GUMAN
Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
article

Contrastive Analysis of English and Urdu Languages

Javed Iqbal, Muhammad Ejaz, Waqar Saleem Rana
article en

Abstract

This research study undertakes an exploratory and descriptive analysis to identify the differences and similarities between pronouns in the English and Urdu languages. Utilizing Lado’s Model of contrastive analysis (1957), the study systematically compares the structures of both languages, aiming to uncover how each handles pronouns across various categories: demonstrative, personal, possessive, reflexive, indefinite, and relative. Data is derived from intermediate-level grammar guides for both languages, supplemented by additional resources for thorough analysis. The findings reveal distinct patterns in pronoun usage, highlighting significant differences in gender representation, pluralization, and cultural nuances. For instance, English pronouns exhibit clear gender distinctions, while Urdu employs the same terms regardless of gender. Additionally, Urdu pronouns reflect varying degrees of formality and intimacy, which lack direct equivalents in English. These insights are critical for understanding the challenges faced by Urdu speakers learning English and can inform educators and curriculum developers in creating tailored instructional strategies. Overall, this study bridges theoretical frameworks with practical applications, contributing to the field of applied linguistics and enhancing the learning experience for students. Keywords: Contrastive analysis, English, Urdu, Pronouns

GUMANVol. 7(3)
Government College University, Faisalabad (PK), University of Faisalabad (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.