Integrating participatory action research and photovoice as mixed methods: Synergies, tensions, and implications for social work

This article examines the integration of two qualitative research methodologies, namely Participatory Action Research (PAR) and Photovoice (PV), to explore their synergies, tensions, and implications for social work. While both methodologies are rooted in participatory, subjectivist-objectivist, and transformative-emancipatory frameworks, they differ in their objectives, methods, and levels of participant involvement. PAR focuses on challenging power structures and promoting systemic change through collaborative community actions. PV prioritizes the use of visual narratives to influence policy and public opinion. Methodologically, PAR follows iterative cycles of action and reflection led by community members, while PV emphasizes individual storytelling. Integrating these approaches thoughtfully can leverage their strengths to foster both individual and collective transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transformative Social Work
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/tsw.v2i2.77602
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating participatory action research and photovoice as mixed methods: Synergies, tensions, and implications for social work

Hieu Van Ngo, Quan Nguyen
Transformative Social Work
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

Integrating participatory action research and photovoice as mixed methods: Synergies, tensions, and implications for social work

Hieu Van Ngo, Quan Nguyen
article en

Abstract

This article examines the integration of two qualitative research methodologies, namely Participatory Action Research (PAR) and Photovoice (PV), to explore their synergies, tensions, and implications for social work. While both methodologies are rooted in participatory, subjectivist-objectivist, and transformative-emancipatory frameworks, they differ in their objectives, methods, and levels of participant involvement. PAR focuses on challenging power structures and promoting systemic change through collaborative community actions. PV prioritizes the use of visual narratives to influence policy and public opinion. Methodologically, PAR follows iterative cycles of action and reflection led by community members, while PV emphasizes individual storytelling. Integrating these approaches thoughtfully can leverage their strengths to foster both individual and collective transformation.

Transformative Social WorkVol. 2(2)
University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.