Cognitive Bias and Sustainable Decision-Making: A Bibliometric Analysis of Emerging Trends and Research Gaps

This paper reviews articles that have been published between 2001 and September 2024 with the emphasis on the impact of cognitive biases on sustainable decisions. By adhering to the PRISMA protocol, the authors analyzed 124 articles set in the WOS and Scopus databases. The results indicate that there is still relatively little empirical evidence and theoretical literature on cognitive biases, such as overconfidence, optimism, narcissism, and their impacts on sustainability performance. In this respect, the study calls for more interdisciplinary studies to connect psychology, corporate strategy, and environmental sciences to produce a more profound understanding of how biases influence sustainability. The bibliometric analysis shows the direction of the research development where the four most productive countries are the US, China, Germany, and India. The study recommends future research combining cognitive psychology with sustainability studies for constructing more inclusive theoretical frameworks to comprehend how and when biases influence sustainable environmental policies and initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sibf63788.2024.10883850
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Bias and Sustainable Decision-Making: A Bibliometric Analysis of Emerging Trends and Research Gaps

Adil Cherkaoui, Youness Oudrhough
2 citations
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
0.98
article

Cognitive Bias and Sustainable Decision-Making: A Bibliometric Analysis of Emerging Trends and Research Gaps

Adil Cherkaoui, Youness Oudrhough
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper reviews articles that have been published between 2001 and September 2024 with the emphasis on the impact of cognitive biases on sustainable decisions. By adhering to the PRISMA protocol, the authors analyzed 124 articles set in the WOS and Scopus databases. The results indicate that there is still relatively little empirical evidence and theoretical literature on cognitive biases, such as overconfidence, optimism, narcissism, and their impacts on sustainability performance. In this respect, the study calls for more interdisciplinary studies to connect psychology, corporate strategy, and environmental sciences to produce a more profound understanding of how biases influence sustainability. The bibliometric analysis shows the direction of the research development where the four most productive countries are the US, China, Germany, and India. The study recommends future research combining cognitive psychology with sustainability studies for constructing more inclusive theoretical frameworks to comprehend how and when biases influence sustainable environmental policies and initiatives.

University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cognitive Bias and Sustainable Decision-Making: A Bibliometric Analysis of Emerging Trends and Research Gaps — Adil Cherkaoui, Youness Oudrhough · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS