Information Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios: Survey and Perspective

Information Extraction (IE) seeks to derive structured information from unstructured texts, often encountering obstacles in low-resource scenarios due to data scarcity and unseen classes. This paper presents a review of neural approaches to low-resource IE from traditional and LLM-based perspectives, systematically organizing them into a fine-grained taxonomy. Our empirical studies compare LLM-based methods with prior leading models, revealing that: (1) well-tuned LMs perform relatively best; (2) tuning open-resource LLMs and in-context learning with GPT family are generally effective; (3) LLMs struggle to tackle complex tasks with intricate schema. Furthermore, we compare traditional methods and discuss LLM-based approaches, spotlighting promising applications and delineating future research directions. This survey aims to foster understanding of this field, inspire new ideas, and encourage widespread applications in both academia and industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ickg63256.2024.00013
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios: Survey and Perspective

Shumin Deng, Bryan Hooi, Ningyu Zhang, Yixin Cao et al.
9 citations
Data Quality and Management
4.41
article

Information Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios: Survey and Perspective

Shumin Deng, Bryan Hooi, Ningyu Zhang, Yixin Cao, Yubo Ma
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Information Extraction (IE) seeks to derive structured information from unstructured texts, often encountering obstacles in low-resource scenarios due to data scarcity and unseen classes. This paper presents a review of neural approaches to low-resource IE from traditional and LLM-based perspectives, systematically organizing them into a fine-grained taxonomy. Our empirical studies compare LLM-based methods with prior leading models, revealing that: (1) well-tuned LMs perform relatively best; (2) tuning open-resource LLMs and in-context learning with GPT family are generally effective; (3) LLMs struggle to tackle complex tasks with intricate schema. Furthermore, we compare traditional methods and discuss LLM-based approaches, spotlighting promising applications and delineating future research directions. This survey aims to foster understanding of this field, inspire new ideas, and encourage widespread applications in both academia and industry.

National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Fudan University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Tencent, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Zhejiang University, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Data Quality and Management
4.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Information Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios: Survey and Perspective — Shumin Deng, Bryan Hooi, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS