Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Sea Ice Thickness Prediction

Arctic sea ice thickness is vital for evaluating Arctic sea ice loss. The study aims to investigate Arctic sea ice thickness prediction using PhySIT, a physics-informed machine learning model for sea ice thickness prediction. We use the PhySIT framework to solve the governing partial differential equations relevant to ice thickness distribution with real-world data, with specific assumptions, as constraints in the loss function. Our proposed approach utilizes physics knowledge to guide the prediction process of LSTM and GRU models. We compare our proposed LSTM and GRU models, which integrate physics, against well-known LSTM-based physics-informed model baselines. The results indicate that our PhySIT-based LSTM and GRU models perform better than the baselines. We also incorporated Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) to PhySIT to capture nonlinear properties associated with sea ice thickness data. Our results show that the PhySIT using KAN shows better predictive performance. We also introduce a modified layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) for spatio-temporal data. This method aims to identify the hidden patterns of the data that are most important for the model’s predictions. We use our LRP method on the sea ice thickness data to highlight the features’ contribution to the models’ predictions. This analysis demonstrates that LSTM models are faster at predicting time series data than GRU models. We use our LRP method on the sea ice thickness data to highlight the features’ contribution to the models’ prediction. Our study shows PhySIT framework, using a combination of GRU or LSTM and KAN, is better at predicting sea ice thickness than other recent physics informed models. Our PhySIT framework that designed infusing physics loss using a combination of GRU or LSTM and KAN, is better at predicting sea ice thickness than other models. Our study highlights the potential of incorporating constrained physics into the loss function to enhance a model’s adherence to data-sparse environments. By combining LSTM architectures, physics-informed approaches, and KAN methodologies, we demonstrate the feasibility of developing more effective and simple predictive models for spatio-temporal data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ickg63256.2024.00048
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Sea Ice Thickness Prediction

Akila Sampath, Omar Faruque, Vandana P. Janeja, Azim Khan et al.
1 citations
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
0.38
article

Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Sea Ice Thickness Prediction

Akila Sampath, Omar Faruque, Vandana P. Janeja, Azim Khan, Jianwu Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Arctic sea ice thickness is vital for evaluating Arctic sea ice loss. The study aims to investigate Arctic sea ice thickness prediction using PhySIT, a physics-informed machine learning model for sea ice thickness prediction. We use the PhySIT framework to solve the governing partial differential equations relevant to ice thickness distribution with real-world data, with specific assumptions, as constraints in the loss function. Our proposed approach utilizes physics knowledge to guide the prediction process of LSTM and GRU models. We compare our proposed LSTM and GRU models, which integrate physics, against well-known LSTM-based physics-informed model baselines. The results indicate that our PhySIT-based LSTM and GRU models perform better than the baselines. We also incorporated Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) to PhySIT to capture nonlinear properties associated with sea ice thickness data. Our results show that the PhySIT using KAN shows better predictive performance. We also introduce a modified layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) for spatio-temporal data. This method aims to identify the hidden patterns of the data that are most important for the model’s predictions. We use our LRP method on the sea ice thickness data to highlight the features’ contribution to the models’ predictions. This analysis demonstrates that LSTM models are faster at predicting time series data than GRU models. We use our LRP method on the sea ice thickness data to highlight the features’ contribution to the models’ prediction. Our study shows PhySIT framework, using a combination of GRU or LSTM and KAN, is better at predicting sea ice thickness than other recent physics informed models. Our PhySIT framework that designed infusing physics loss using a combination of GRU or LSTM and KAN, is better at predicting sea ice thickness than other models. Our study highlights the potential of incorporating constrained physics into the loss function to enhance a model’s adherence to data-sparse environments. By combining LSTM architectures, physics-informed approaches, and KAN methodologies, we demonstrate the feasibility of developing more effective and simple predictive models for spatio-temporal data.

University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
0.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.