Towards an Improved Metric for Evaluating Disentangled Representations

Disentangled representation learning plays a pivotal role in making representations controllable, interpretable and transferable. Despite its significance in the domain, the quest for reliable and consistent quantitative disentanglement metric remains a major challenge. This stems from the utilisation of diverse metrics measuring different properties and the potential bias introduced by their design. Our work undertakes a comprehensive examination of existing popular disentanglement evaluation metrics, comparing them in terms of measuring aspects of disentanglement (viz. Modularity, Compactness, and Explicitness), detecting the factor-code relationship, and describing the degree of disentanglement. We propose a new framework for quantifying disentanglement, introducing a metric entitled EDI, that leverages the intuitive concept of exclusivity and improved factor-code relationship to minimize ad-hoc decisions. An in-depth analysis reveals that EDI measures essential properties while offering more stability than existing metrics, advocating for its adoption as a standardised approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ickg63256.2024.00027
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an Improved Metric for Evaluating Disentangled Representations

Michael Granitzer, Sahib Julka, Y. S. Wang
Digital Media Forensic Detection
article

Towards an Improved Metric for Evaluating Disentangled Representations

Michael Granitzer, Sahib Julka, Y. S. Wang
article en

Abstract

Disentangled representation learning plays a pivotal role in making representations controllable, interpretable and transferable. Despite its significance in the domain, the quest for reliable and consistent quantitative disentanglement metric remains a major challenge. This stems from the utilisation of diverse metrics measuring different properties and the potential bias introduced by their design. Our work undertakes a comprehensive examination of existing popular disentanglement evaluation metrics, comparing them in terms of measuring aspects of disentanglement (viz. Modularity, Compactness, and Explicitness), detecting the factor-code relationship, and describing the degree of disentanglement. We propose a new framework for quantifying disentanglement, introducing a metric entitled EDI, that leverages the intuitive concept of exclusivity and improved factor-code relationship to minimize ad-hoc decisions. An in-depth analysis reveals that EDI measures essential properties while offering more stability than existing metrics, advocating for its adoption as a standardised approach.

University of Passau (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.