Development of a rapid automated binaural detection task

Three different automated procedures for efficiently measuring the 500 Hz N0Sπ binaural tone detection threshold of individuals with normal audiometric thresholds were tested with 6803 subjects and the results are compared with an automated version of an existing clinical procedure. Two of these procedures resulted in substantially reduced binaural detection performance and caused a notable decrease in the reliability of the behavior of the subjects. The remaining procedure was an 18-trial yes/no procedure and the difficulty of the trials in this procedure varied in a non-monotonic manner. This procedure not only has fewer trials than the existing clinical procedure but the reliability of the estimate of threshold is improved. The average difference in threshold between this procedure and the clinical procedure was only -0.67 dB, which is likely not clinically significant. Further, only 0.35% of the 6208 subjects tested with the non-monotonic-order procedure were unable to complete the fully automated test which was better than the failure rate for the automated version of the clinical procedure. With such a low failure rate, the modified procedure appears suitable for use as a rapid tool for helping to detect functional hearing deficits that are not captured by the audiogram.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035644
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a rapid automated binaural detection task

Ken W. Grant, Daniel E. Shub, Douglas S. Brungart
1 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
article

Development of a rapid automated binaural detection task

Ken W. Grant, Daniel E. Shub, Douglas S. Brungart
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Three different automated procedures for efficiently measuring the 500 Hz N0Sπ binaural tone detection threshold of individuals with normal audiometric thresholds were tested with 6803 subjects and the results are compared with an automated version of an existing clinical procedure. Two of these procedures resulted in substantially reduced binaural detection performance and caused a notable decrease in the reliability of the behavior of the subjects. The remaining procedure was an 18-trial yes/no procedure and the difficulty of the trials in this procedure varied in a non-monotonic manner. This procedure not only has fewer trials than the existing clinical procedure but the reliability of the estimate of threshold is improved. The average difference in threshold between this procedure and the clinical procedure was only -0.67 dB, which is likely not clinically significant. Further, only 0.35% of the 6208 subjects tested with the non-monotonic-order procedure were unable to complete the fully automated test which was better than the failure rate for the automated version of the clinical procedure. With such a low failure rate, the modified procedure appears suitable for use as a rapid tool for helping to detect functional hearing deficits that are not captured by the audiogram.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(2)
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.