Gender Differences in Homicide Sentencing : Analysis of Male and Female Victim Groups

The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences in the sentences given to convicted homicide offenders in the Seoul District Court, South Korea. The focal concern theory, conflict theory, and chivalry hypothesis were employed to develop the research hypotheses and models. The subjects of this study are 232 cases in which a verdict was imposed between 2012 and December 2023. The cases were limited to those involving a single perpetrator and a single victim. The results of the analysis show that there are differences in the factors that influence the sentencing of homicide offenders based on the victim's gender. The seriousness of the offense, premeditation, and the use of brutal methods all have a significant positive effect on sentencing for both male and female victim groups. However, in cases involving culpable male victim, offenders are less likely to receive severe sentences. Non-support for punishment and self-reporting have a significant negative effect on sentencing, but only for offenders who have killed women. The results also indicate that a closer relationship between the female victim and the offender is associated with less severe sentencing. The implications of these significant findings for the justice system are explored. The limitations of the study are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Association for Terrorism Studies
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46350/kats.2024.17.3.184
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Differences in Homicide Sentencing : Analysis of Male and Female Victim Groups

Seong Jin Jo, Soo‐Jin Park
The Korean Association for Terrorism Studies
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Gender Differences in Homicide Sentencing : Analysis of Male and Female Victim Groups

Seong Jin Jo, Soo‐Jin Park
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences in the sentences given to convicted homicide offenders in the Seoul District Court, South Korea. The focal concern theory, conflict theory, and chivalry hypothesis were employed to develop the research hypotheses and models. The subjects of this study are 232 cases in which a verdict was imposed between 2012 and December 2023. The cases were limited to those involving a single perpetrator and a single victim. The results of the analysis show that there are differences in the factors that influence the sentencing of homicide offenders based on the victim's gender. The seriousness of the offense, premeditation, and the use of brutal methods all have a significant positive effect on sentencing for both male and female victim groups. However, in cases involving culpable male victim, offenders are less likely to receive severe sentences. Non-support for punishment and self-reporting have a significant negative effect on sentencing, but only for offenders who have killed women. The results also indicate that a closer relationship between the female victim and the offender is associated with less severe sentencing. The implications of these significant findings for the justice system are explored. The limitations of the study are discussed.

The Korean Association for Terrorism StudiesVol. 17(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.