Relocating seismic events in the North Sea: challenges and insights for earthquake analysis

SUMMARY In this paper, we present a catalogue of relocated seismic events in the North Sea spanning 1961 to 2022. Data from all relevant agencies were combined, incorporating all available seismic phase readings, thereby enhancing station coverage. As a result, our updated locations reveal a more clustered and aligned seismicity pattern compared with the original catalogue. Even with our combined data set, only 157 of the 7089 relocated events have azimuthal gaps of less than 90 deg. Additionally, the distances between onshore stations and offshore events are considerable. Both of these factors lead to relatively poorly constrained hypocentres for most events. We therefore evaluate the performance of 1-D velocity models routinely used by different North Sea adjacent monitoring agencies for earthquake location estimations in the North Sea. The variations in assessments due to the seismic velocity model used are significantly larger than the uncertainty ellipses calculated in the relocation, demonstrating that arithmetic uncertainties systematically underestimate location uncertainties in this setting. Obtaining a realistic estimate of location uncertainty is however crucial, particularly for distinguishing between natural and induced seismicity. This is fundamental to safe monitoring of the North Sea offshore industries, including geological $\mathrm{ CO}_2$ storage. To overcome these discrepancies between the uncertainty ellipses and our multiple relocations, we introduce an alternative method that accounts for variability in the 1-D velocity models. This approach enhances the reliability of the earthquake catalogue, and provides a more robust assessment of seismic activity in the North Sea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf068
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relocating seismic events in the North Sea: challenges and insights for earthquake analysis

Evgeniia Martuganova, Annie Jerkins, Johannes Schweitzer, Tom Kettlety et al.
Geophysical Journal International
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Relocating seismic events in the North Sea: challenges and insights for earthquake analysis

Evgeniia Martuganova, Annie Jerkins, Johannes Schweitzer, Tom Kettlety, Daniela Kühn, Volker Øye
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY In this paper, we present a catalogue of relocated seismic events in the North Sea spanning 1961 to 2022. Data from all relevant agencies were combined, incorporating all available seismic phase readings, thereby enhancing station coverage. As a result, our updated locations reveal a more clustered and aligned seismicity pattern compared with the original catalogue. Even with our combined data set, only 157 of the 7089 relocated events have azimuthal gaps of less than 90 deg. Additionally, the distances between onshore stations and offshore events are considerable. Both of these factors lead to relatively poorly constrained hypocentres for most events. We therefore evaluate the performance of 1-D velocity models routinely used by different North Sea adjacent monitoring agencies for earthquake location estimations in the North Sea. The variations in assessments due to the seismic velocity model used are significantly larger than the uncertainty ellipses calculated in the relocation, demonstrating that arithmetic uncertainties systematically underestimate location uncertainties in this setting. Obtaining a realistic estimate of location uncertainty is however crucial, particularly for distinguishing between natural and induced seismicity. This is fundamental to safe monitoring of the North Sea offshore industries, including geological $\mathrm{ CO}_2$ storage. To overcome these discrepancies between the uncertainty ellipses and our multiple relocations, we introduce an alternative method that accounts for variability in the 1-D velocity models. This approach enhances the reliability of the earthquake catalogue, and provides a more robust assessment of seismic activity in the North Sea.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 241(1)
University of Oslo (NO), University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Norsar (NO)
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, University of Oxford, British Geological Survey, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Nationale Geologiske Undersøgelser for Danmark og Grønland, Intelligent Systems Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.