Chromosomal instability in tumor suppressor genes–altered prostate cancer.

226 Background: Metastatic prostate cancer (PC) accumulates significant genomic alterations as the disease progresses, exhibiting the highest levels of chromosomal instability (CIN) among all metastatic tumors (Bakhoum, Nature 2018). Furthermore, tumor suppressor genes (TSG; RB1 , PTEN and TP53 ) are frequently altered in metastatic PC and are associated with adverse outcomes. Here, we aim to investigate CIN in metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) harbouring alterations in TSG. Methods: TSG and whole transcriptome gene expression was assessed by nCounter platform (N=354) and RNA-seq (N=60) in mHPSC samples, respectively. TSG low was considered when ≥2 out of 3 TSG presented low expression of a previously stablished cut-off, and TSG wt in the remaining cases. Differential gene expression analysis between TSG low vs TSG wt tumors of our RNA-seq cohort (N=60) and TCGA cohort (N=333) was performed. Differential expressed genes (DEGs) were considered if FDR <0.05 and log2FoldChange (LFC)>0.5. DEGs were correlated with castration-resistance PC-free survival (CRPC-FS) and overall survival (OS) by Cox analysis. CIN gene signatures were obtained from literature and the rest of Hallmark signatures from MSigDB. Results: In our cohort of mHSPC patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy + docetaxel, TSG low tumors (16.7%) displayed higher levels of CIN compared with TSG wt (CIN25 normalized enrichment score [NES] 2.13, p<0.001 and CIN70 NES 2.54, p<0001). Cell cycle and DNA-repair signatures were also overexpressed in TSG low tumors, contrasting with a low expression of androgen receptor pathway. Results were validated in the TCGA cohort, where TSG low presented also overexpression of CIN signatures. In our RNA-seq cohort, we found 22 DEGs associated with CIN (29.3% of the total DEGs) in TSG low tumors compared with TSG wt . 51 genes were significantly correlated with CRPC-FS in a multivariate analysis and 16 of them (31,3%) were CIN-associated genes. Among these genes, 5 encode proteins that are targetable for metastatic PC, with specific inhibitors already developed: BUB1 (LFC 1.06, FDR 0.034), CDC7 (LFC 12.4 FDR 0.003), KIFC1 , (LFC 11,7, FDR 0.01), PLK1 (LFC 1.08, FDR <0.001) and WEE1 (LFC 0.79, FDR 0.011). Conclusions: TSG-altered mHSPC tumors harbor high levels of CIN, and differentially expressed CIN-associated genes could potentially be targets in mHSPC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.226
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chromosomal instability in tumor suppressor genes–altered prostate cancer.

Marta García de Herreros, Samuel García-Esteve, Natàlia Jiménez, Begoña Mellado et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
article

Chromosomal instability in tumor suppressor genes–altered prostate cancer.

Marta García de Herreros, Samuel García-Esteve, Natàlia Jiménez, Begoña Mellado, Albert Font Pous, Òscar Reig, Laura Ferrer‐Mileo, Joan Padrosa, Laia Fernández-Mañas, Vicente Ruiz de Porras
article en

Abstract

226 Background: Metastatic prostate cancer (PC) accumulates significant genomic alterations as the disease progresses, exhibiting the highest levels of chromosomal instability (CIN) among all metastatic tumors (Bakhoum, Nature 2018). Furthermore, tumor suppressor genes (TSG; RB1 , PTEN and TP53 ) are frequently altered in metastatic PC and are associated with adverse outcomes. Here, we aim to investigate CIN in metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) harbouring alterations in TSG. Methods: TSG and whole transcriptome gene expression was assessed by nCounter platform (N=354) and RNA-seq (N=60) in mHPSC samples, respectively. TSG low was considered when ≥2 out of 3 TSG presented low expression of a previously stablished cut-off, and TSG wt in the remaining cases. Differential gene expression analysis between TSG low vs TSG wt tumors of our RNA-seq cohort (N=60) and TCGA cohort (N=333) was performed. Differential expressed genes (DEGs) were considered if FDR <0.05 and log2FoldChange (LFC)>0.5. DEGs were correlated with castration-resistance PC-free survival (CRPC-FS) and overall survival (OS) by Cox analysis. CIN gene signatures were obtained from literature and the rest of Hallmark signatures from MSigDB. Results: In our cohort of mHSPC patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy + docetaxel, TSG low tumors (16.7%) displayed higher levels of CIN compared with TSG wt (CIN25 normalized enrichment score [NES] 2.13, p<0.001 and CIN70 NES 2.54, p<0001). Cell cycle and DNA-repair signatures were also overexpressed in TSG low tumors, contrasting with a low expression of androgen receptor pathway. Results were validated in the TCGA cohort, where TSG low presented also overexpression of CIN signatures. In our RNA-seq cohort, we found 22 DEGs associated with CIN (29.3% of the total DEGs) in TSG low tumors compared with TSG wt . 51 genes were significantly correlated with CRPC-FS in a multivariate analysis and 16 of them (31,3%) were CIN-associated genes. Among these genes, 5 encode proteins that are targetable for metastatic PC, with specific inhibitors already developed: BUB1 (LFC 1.06, FDR 0.034), CDC7 (LFC 12.4 FDR 0.003), KIFC1 , (LFC 11,7, FDR 0.01), PLK1 (LFC 1.08, FDR <0.001) and WEE1 (LFC 0.79, FDR 0.011). Conclusions: TSG-altered mHSPC tumors harbor high levels of CIN, and differentially expressed CIN-associated genes could potentially be targets in mHSPC.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.