Improved differentiation of prostate cancer using advanced diffusion models: a comparative study of mono-exponential, fractional-order-calculus, and multi-compartment models

Advanced diffusion models, particularly the MC model, demonstrated a significant improvement over ADC in differentiating prostate lesions, especially between low and intermediate-risk PCa, between intermediate and high-risk PCa, and between clinically significant and insignificant PCa. Comparable performance was observed in distinguishing BPH from PCa among three models. Moreover, the combination of MC and FROC models further enhanced differentiation accuracy, particularly in the more challenging classifications between intermediate and high-risk PCa, where ADC alone proved inadequate. These results highlight the potential clinical value of MC model and combining MC and FROC models for more precise PCa risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Abdominal Radiology
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04684-z
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved differentiation of prostate cancer using advanced diffusion models: a comparative study of mono-exponential, fractional-order-calculus, and multi-compartment models

Minxiong Zhou, Bing Du, Shengdong Nie, Yongsheng He et al.
Abdominal Radiology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Improved differentiation of prostate cancer using advanced diffusion models: a comparative study of mono-exponential, fractional-order-calculus, and multi-compartment models

Minxiong Zhou, Bing Du, Shengdong Nie, Yongsheng He, Wuling Wang, Yan Xu, Mengxiao Liu, Xuan Qi, Hongkai Yang
article en

Abstract

Advanced diffusion models, particularly the MC model, demonstrated a significant improvement over ADC in differentiating prostate lesions, especially between low and intermediate-risk PCa, between intermediate and high-risk PCa, and between clinically significant and insignificant PCa. Comparable performance was observed in distinguishing BPH from PCa among three models. Moreover, the combination of MC and FROC models further enhanced differentiation accuracy, particularly in the more challenging classifications between intermediate and high-risk PCa, where ADC alone proved inadequate. These results highlight the potential clinical value of MC model and combining MC and FROC models for more precise PCa risk stratification.

Abdominal RadiologyVol. 50(9)
Wannan Medical College (CN), University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN), Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN), Anshan Hospital (CN), Siemens (China) (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.