Understanding soil loss in Mollisol permanent gully head cuts through hydrological and hydromechanical responses

Abstract. During permanent gully development, soil losses on steep slopes and in channel beds are primarily driven by the hydromechanical response and water storage within the soil mass. However, this aspect has been largely overlooked in previous studies on gully erosion in the Mollisol region of northeast China. In this study, erosion intensities during the 111 d of the rainy season and the 97 d of the snow-melting season were analyzed in relation to soil water storage, drainage capacity, and soil suction stress. This analysis was supported by monitoring soil moisture, temperature, and precipitation, as well as experimental investigations of soil hydromechanical properties. Under the same confining stress, Mollisols at the interrupted head cut of Gully no. II exhibited a more rapid increase and more effective dissipation of pore water pressure compared to those at the uninterrupted head cut of Gully no. I. The combination of the soil water characteristic curve and the hydraulic conductivity function revealed that the Mollisols in Gully no. II had a lower air-entry pressure and higher saturated hydraulic conductivity during wetting and drying cycles than those in Gully no. I. The head cut area of Gully no. II demonstrated a rapid water infiltration and drainage response coupled with high soil water storage capacity. The absolute suction stresses within the Mollisols of Gully no. II were lower than those in Gully no. I, potentially leading to greater erosion per unit of steep slope area. Notably, gravitational mass wasting on steep slopes was closely associated with soil suction stress, and a correlation was observed between erosion per unit in the gully bed area and soil water storage. Therefore, predicting soil loss in permanent gullies requires more emphasis on soil water storage and the hydromechanical response of the soil mass rather than solely on rainfall amounts. Specifically, considering the required water storage capacity to generate runoff intensity and reduce suction stress may enable more accurate predictions of soil loss at the permanent gully head cut.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-823-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding soil loss in Mollisol permanent gully head cuts through hydrological and hydromechanical responses

Chao Ma, Jie Tang, Jie Dong, Yan Zhang et al.
2 citations
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Soil erosion and sediment transport
2.37
article

Understanding soil loss in Mollisol permanent gully head cuts through hydrological and hydromechanical responses

Chao Ma, Jie Tang, Jie Dong, Yan Zhang, Yanru Wen, Shoupeng Wang, Dongshuo Zheng
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. During permanent gully development, soil losses on steep slopes and in channel beds are primarily driven by the hydromechanical response and water storage within the soil mass. However, this aspect has been largely overlooked in previous studies on gully erosion in the Mollisol region of northeast China. In this study, erosion intensities during the 111 d of the rainy season and the 97 d of the snow-melting season were analyzed in relation to soil water storage, drainage capacity, and soil suction stress. This analysis was supported by monitoring soil moisture, temperature, and precipitation, as well as experimental investigations of soil hydromechanical properties. Under the same confining stress, Mollisols at the interrupted head cut of Gully no. II exhibited a more rapid increase and more effective dissipation of pore water pressure compared to those at the uninterrupted head cut of Gully no. I. The combination of the soil water characteristic curve and the hydraulic conductivity function revealed that the Mollisols in Gully no. II had a lower air-entry pressure and higher saturated hydraulic conductivity during wetting and drying cycles than those in Gully no. I. The head cut area of Gully no. II demonstrated a rapid water infiltration and drainage response coupled with high soil water storage capacity. The absolute suction stresses within the Mollisols of Gully no. II were lower than those in Gully no. I, potentially leading to greater erosion per unit of steep slope area. Notably, gravitational mass wasting on steep slopes was closely associated with soil suction stress, and a correlation was observed between erosion per unit in the gully bed area and soil water storage. Therefore, predicting soil loss in permanent gullies requires more emphasis on soil water storage and the hydromechanical response of the soil mass rather than solely on rainfall amounts. Specifically, considering the required water storage capacity to generate runoff intensity and reduce suction stress may enable more accurate predictions of soil loss at the permanent gully head cut.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 29(4)
Clarkson University (US), Beijing Normal University (CN), Beijing Forestry University (CN), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Beijing Normal University, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.