Reconstruction of Arctic sea ice thickness (1992–2010) based on a hybrid machine learning and data assimilation approach

Abstract. Arctic sea ice thickness (SIT) remains one of the most crucial yet challenging parameters to estimate. Satellite data generally present temporal and spatial discontinuities, which constrain studies focusing on long-term evolution. Since 2011, the combined satellite product CryoSat-2 (CS2) and Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), CS2SMOS, enables more accurate SIT retrievals that significantly decrease modelled SIT errors during assimilation. Can we extrapolate the benefits of data assimilation to past periods lacking accurate SIT observations? In this study, we train a machine learning (ML) algorithm to learn the systematic SIT errors between two simulations of the model TOPAZ4 over 2011–2022, one with CS2SMOS assimilation and another without any assimilation, to predict the SIT error and extrapolate the SIT prior to 2011. The ML algorithm relies on SIT coming from the two versions of TOPAZ4, various oceanographic variables, and atmospheric forcing from ERA5. Over the test period of 2011–2013, the ML method outperforms TOPAZ4 without CS2SMOS assimilation when compared to TOPAZ4 assimilating CS2SMOS. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) in Arctic-averaged SIT decreases from 0.42 to 0.28 m and the bias from −0.18 to 0.01 m. Also, despite the lack of observations available for assimilation in summer, our method still demonstrates a crucial improvement in SIT. Relative to independent mooring data in the central Arctic between 2001 and 2010, mean SIT bias reduces from −1.74 to −0.85 m when using the ML algorithm. In the Beaufort Gyre, our method approaches the performance of a basic correction algorithm. Ultimately, the ML-adjusted SIT reconstruction reveals an Arctic mean SIT of 1.61 m in 1992 compared to 1.08 m in 2022. This corresponds to a decline in total sea ice volume from 19 690 to 12 700 km3, with an associated trend of −3153 km3 per decade. These changes are accompanied by a distinct shift in SIT distribution. Our innovative approach proves its ability to correct a significant part of the primary biases of the model by combining data assimilation with machine learning. Although this new reconstructed SIT dataset has not yet been assimilated into TOPAZ4, future work could enable the correction to be further propagated to other sea ice and ocean variables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-731-2025
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstruction of Arctic sea ice thickness (1992–2010) based on a hybrid machine learning and data assimilation approach

Laurent Bertino, Anton Korosov, Jiping Xie, Julien Brajard et al.
8 citations
˜The œcryosphere
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
10.41
article

Reconstruction of Arctic sea ice thickness (1992–2010) based on a hybrid machine learning and data assimilation approach

Laurent Bertino, Anton Korosov, Jiping Xie, Julien Brajard, Léo Edel
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Arctic sea ice thickness (SIT) remains one of the most crucial yet challenging parameters to estimate. Satellite data generally present temporal and spatial discontinuities, which constrain studies focusing on long-term evolution. Since 2011, the combined satellite product CryoSat-2 (CS2) and Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), CS2SMOS, enables more accurate SIT retrievals that significantly decrease modelled SIT errors during assimilation. Can we extrapolate the benefits of data assimilation to past periods lacking accurate SIT observations? In this study, we train a machine learning (ML) algorithm to learn the systematic SIT errors between two simulations of the model TOPAZ4 over 2011–2022, one with CS2SMOS assimilation and another without any assimilation, to predict the SIT error and extrapolate the SIT prior to 2011. The ML algorithm relies on SIT coming from the two versions of TOPAZ4, various oceanographic variables, and atmospheric forcing from ERA5. Over the test period of 2011–2013, the ML method outperforms TOPAZ4 without CS2SMOS assimilation when compared to TOPAZ4 assimilating CS2SMOS. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) in Arctic-averaged SIT decreases from 0.42 to 0.28 m and the bias from −0.18 to 0.01 m. Also, despite the lack of observations available for assimilation in summer, our method still demonstrates a crucial improvement in SIT. Relative to independent mooring data in the central Arctic between 2001 and 2010, mean SIT bias reduces from −1.74 to −0.85 m when using the ML algorithm. In the Beaufort Gyre, our method approaches the performance of a basic correction algorithm. Ultimately, the ML-adjusted SIT reconstruction reveals an Arctic mean SIT of 1.61 m in 1992 compared to 1.08 m in 2022. This corresponds to a decline in total sea ice volume from 19 690 to 12 700 km3, with an associated trend of −3153 km3 per decade. These changes are accompanied by a distinct shift in SIT distribution. Our innovative approach proves its ability to correct a significant part of the primary biases of the model by combining data assimilation with machine learning. Although this new reconstructed SIT dataset has not yet been assimilated into TOPAZ4, future work could enable the correction to be further propagated to other sea ice and ocean variables.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 19(2)
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO), Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center (NO)
China Scholarship Council, Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
10.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.