Identification of Active Component Functions in Finite-Max Minimisation via a Smooth Reformulation

Abstract In this work, we consider a nonsmooth minimisation problem in which the objective function can be represented as the maximum of finitely many smooth “component functions”. First, we study a smooth min–max reformulation of the problem. Due to this smoothness, the model provides enhanced capability of exploiting the structure of the problem, when compared to methods that attempt to tackle the nonsmooth problem directly. Then, we present several approaches to identify the set of active component functions at a minimiser, all within finitely many iterations of a first order method for solving the smooth model. As is well known, the problem can be equivalently rewritten in terms of these component functions, but a key challenge is to identify this set a priori. Such an identification is clearly beneficial in an algorithmic sense, since we can discard those component functions which are not necessary to describe the solution, which in turn can facilitate faster convergence. Finally, numerical results comparing the accuracy of each of these approaches are presented, along with the effect they have on reducing the complexity of the original problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Mathematics & Optimization
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-025-10229-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Control Systems and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Active Component Functions in Finite-Max Minimisation via a Smooth Reformulation

Daniel J. Uteda, Matthew K. Tam, Charl Ras
1 citations
Applied Mathematics & Optimization
Control Systems and Identification
1.21
article

Identification of Active Component Functions in Finite-Max Minimisation via a Smooth Reformulation

Daniel J. Uteda, Matthew K. Tam, Charl Ras
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we consider a nonsmooth minimisation problem in which the objective function can be represented as the maximum of finitely many smooth “component functions”. First, we study a smooth min–max reformulation of the problem. Due to this smoothness, the model provides enhanced capability of exploiting the structure of the problem, when compared to methods that attempt to tackle the nonsmooth problem directly. Then, we present several approaches to identify the set of active component functions at a minimiser, all within finitely many iterations of a first order method for solving the smooth model. As is well known, the problem can be equivalently rewritten in terms of these component functions, but a key challenge is to identify this set a priori. Such an identification is clearly beneficial in an algorithmic sense, since we can discard those component functions which are not necessary to describe the solution, which in turn can facilitate faster convergence. Finally, numerical results comparing the accuracy of each of these approaches are presented, along with the effect they have on reducing the complexity of the original problem.

Applied Mathematics & OptimizationVol. 91(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
University of Melbourne, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Control Systems and Identification
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identification of Active Component Functions in Finite-Max Minimisation via a Smooth Reformulation — Daniel J. Uteda, Matthew K. Tam, et al. · Applied Mathematics & Optimization (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS