An evaluation of speech therapy care in the surrounding area of an interdisciplinary cleft lip and palate tertiary care center

The anatomical deformation in cleft patients requires speech therapy to support cleft patients as best as possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the standard of knowledge of therapists concerning clefts. Furthermore, the study aimed to determine whether there was a difference between therapists with and without treatment experience in cleft patients as well as among therapists with more or less years of general professional experience. We developed a questionnaire about different areas of speech therapy: "General," "Speech therapy," "Development opportunities and influences," and "Interdisciplinary collaboration." For a total of 50 questions, we used single-, multiple-choice questions and the visual analog scale (VAS). Speech therapists with experience in treating cleft patients (n = 43) felt more confident regarding their knowledge and abilities than therapists without experience (n = 61), especially concerning nonspecialist disciplines and cleft specifications. No difference was found in therapy duration, indications, influences, and potential for development. Professional experience (years) and cleft experience correlate; with more knowledge in the group with more than 8 years of experience. Cleft centers remain first choice for patients' care thanks to the higher number of patients, daily treatment routine, the direct contact among examiners, and a common treatment concept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90588-x
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evaluation of speech therapy care in the surrounding area of an interdisciplinary cleft lip and palate tertiary care center

Sebastian Seidel, Mark Ooms, Ali Modabber, Frank Hölzle et al.
Scientific Reports
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

An evaluation of speech therapy care in the surrounding area of an interdisciplinary cleft lip and palate tertiary care center

Sebastian Seidel, Mark Ooms, Ali Modabber, Frank Hölzle, Katharina Schaffrath
article en

Abstract

The anatomical deformation in cleft patients requires speech therapy to support cleft patients as best as possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the standard of knowledge of therapists concerning clefts. Furthermore, the study aimed to determine whether there was a difference between therapists with and without treatment experience in cleft patients as well as among therapists with more or less years of general professional experience. We developed a questionnaire about different areas of speech therapy: "General," "Speech therapy," "Development opportunities and influences," and "Interdisciplinary collaboration." For a total of 50 questions, we used single-, multiple-choice questions and the visual analog scale (VAS). Speech therapists with experience in treating cleft patients (n = 43) felt more confident regarding their knowledge and abilities than therapists without experience (n = 61), especially concerning nonspecialist disciplines and cleft specifications. No difference was found in therapy duration, indications, influences, and potential for development. Professional experience (years) and cleft experience correlate; with more knowledge in the group with more than 8 years of experience. Cleft centers remain first choice for patients' care thanks to the higher number of patients, daily treatment routine, the direct contact among examiners, and a common treatment concept.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.