Coloniality, Socio‐Epistemic Vices and the Question of Knowledge in Iran

ABSTRACT While a diverse group of scholars from a wide variety of academic disciplines addressed and questioned Euro‐Americocentric hegemony as the dominant orientation in knowledge production, I believe that Euro‐Americocentrism is not the only problem that affects knowledge production. I am concerned that scholars are caught in a circle of mapping the contours of this Euro‐Americocentric hegemony in knowledge production that they mostly fail to perceive other forms of coloniality enacted by the non‐whites and the Global South. There are less‐noticed but everyday non‐Eurocentric forms of socio‐epistemic vices and hegemonic orientations, many of which lead to distrust, sexism and racism, exclusion, and alienation. These socio‐epistemic vices cause epistemic harm and can be seen as parallel to Euro‐Americocentrism. Anchored within such discourse, this paper reinforces a paradigm of decoloniality that involves scrutinizing behaviors and practices as everyday social interactions reflect deep‐rooted epistemology. Using examples of socio‐epistemic vices in Iran, I demonstrate how these vices and subjugations affect knowledge production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology Compass
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70040
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coloniality, Socio‐Epistemic Vices and the Question of Knowledge in Iran

Esmaeil Zeiny
1 links
Sociology Compass
Islamic Studies and History
article

Coloniality, Socio‐Epistemic Vices and the Question of Knowledge in Iran

Esmaeil Zeiny
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT While a diverse group of scholars from a wide variety of academic disciplines addressed and questioned Euro‐Americocentric hegemony as the dominant orientation in knowledge production, I believe that Euro‐Americocentrism is not the only problem that affects knowledge production. I am concerned that scholars are caught in a circle of mapping the contours of this Euro‐Americocentric hegemony in knowledge production that they mostly fail to perceive other forms of coloniality enacted by the non‐whites and the Global South. There are less‐noticed but everyday non‐Eurocentric forms of socio‐epistemic vices and hegemonic orientations, many of which lead to distrust, sexism and racism, exclusion, and alienation. These socio‐epistemic vices cause epistemic harm and can be seen as parallel to Euro‐Americocentrism. Anchored within such discourse, this paper reinforces a paradigm of decoloniality that involves scrutinizing behaviors and practices as everyday social interactions reflect deep‐rooted epistemology. Using examples of socio‐epistemic vices in Iran, I demonstrate how these vices and subjugations affect knowledge production.

Sociology CompassVol. 19(2)
Xiamen University Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.