Robust prediction of water arsenic levels downstream of gold mines affected by acid mine drainage using hybrid ensemble machine learning and soft computing

Water pollution from hazardous materials, particularly arsenic, downstream of gold mines poses severe environmental and health risks. This study employs a systematic approach to predict water arsenic (WA) levels downstream of gold mines affected by acid mine drainage. WA data from the affected region were collected and preprocessed to standardize the dataset and mitigate overfitting risks. Advanced ensemble machine learning methods, particularly Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), with two models developed: a manually-adjusted version and an optimization-based model using Jellyfish Search Optimizer (JSO). The performance of the LightGBM-JSO model was evaluated against a range of ensemble learning models, metaheuristic algorithms, and artificial intelligence techniques. Models were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), root mean square error (RMSE), weighted mean absolute percentage error (WMAPE), mean relative error (MRE), scattered index (SI), ρ, and the Final Rating (FRa) methodology. The LightGBM-JSO outperformed other models, achieving a training phase MAE of 148.763, MAPE of 62.081, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.996, RMSE of 183.692, WMAPE of 0.08, SI of 0.097, ρ of 0.048, and MRE of - 0.379. In the testing phase, it had an MAE of 19.496, MAPE of 10.686, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.990, RMSE of 37.386, WMAPE of 0.136, SI of 0.241, ρ of 0.121, and MRE of 0.03. Uncertainty analysis confirmed the model's reliability with a prediction interval of ± 0.05 mg/L for arsenic concentration. This study provides evidence to support environmental management decisions, providing valuable insights for regulatory bodies, policymakers, and stakeholders to support sustainable mining practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137665
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Mine drainage and remediation techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust prediction of water arsenic levels downstream of gold mines affected by acid mine drainage using hybrid ensemble machine learning and soft computing

Rehan Sadiq, Ezzeddin Bakhtavar, Kasun Hewage, Haroon R. Mian et al.
11 citations
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Mine drainage and remediation techniques
9.46
article

Robust prediction of water arsenic levels downstream of gold mines affected by acid mine drainage using hybrid ensemble machine learning and soft computing

Rehan Sadiq, Ezzeddin Bakhtavar, Kasun Hewage, Haroon R. Mian, Shahab Hosseini
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Water pollution from hazardous materials, particularly arsenic, downstream of gold mines poses severe environmental and health risks. This study employs a systematic approach to predict water arsenic (WA) levels downstream of gold mines affected by acid mine drainage. WA data from the affected region were collected and preprocessed to standardize the dataset and mitigate overfitting risks. Advanced ensemble machine learning methods, particularly Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), with two models developed: a manually-adjusted version and an optimization-based model using Jellyfish Search Optimizer (JSO). The performance of the LightGBM-JSO model was evaluated against a range of ensemble learning models, metaheuristic algorithms, and artificial intelligence techniques. Models were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), root mean square error (RMSE), weighted mean absolute percentage error (WMAPE), mean relative error (MRE), scattered index (SI), ρ, and the Final Rating (FRa) methodology. The LightGBM-JSO outperformed other models, achieving a training phase MAE of 148.763, MAPE of 62.081, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.996, RMSE of 183.692, WMAPE of 0.08, SI of 0.097, ρ of 0.048, and MRE of - 0.379. In the testing phase, it had an MAE of 19.496, MAPE of 10.686, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.990, RMSE of 37.386, WMAPE of 0.136, SI of 0.241, ρ of 0.121, and MRE of 0.03. Uncertainty analysis confirmed the model's reliability with a prediction interval of ± 0.05 mg/L for arsenic concentration. This study provides evidence to support environmental management decisions, providing valuable insights for regulatory bodies, policymakers, and stakeholders to support sustainable mining practices.

Journal of Hazardous MaterialsVol. 489
University of British Columbia (CA), Tarbiat Modares University (IR), Laurentian University (CA)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mine drainage and remediation techniques
9.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.