Safety assessment for a geological disposal facility in domal salt: The Dutch case

In the Netherlands, all radioactive waste is currently collected and stored above ground for at least 100 years by COVRA. After 100 years, all radioactive waste must be permanently disposed of. One option for permanent disposal currently considered is a purpose-built geological disposal facility in rock salt, where a combination of natural and engineered barriers is expected to provide the necessary safety. Rock salt, as a natural barrier, is considered impermeable when undisturbed. Therefore, radionuclides can only reach the surface via the mined openings of the geological disposal facility. Here, multiple engineered barriers provide the necessary safety. In the short term, these include concrete seals, HLW packages, and waste forms. In the long term, moisturized granular salt backfill provides containment. Here, we present the safety assessment of a geological disposal facility in rock salt, using the updated Dutch disposal concept and waste inventory. In total, seven different scenarios are modelled: the (1) normal evolution scenario in which the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, and six alternative scenarios: failure of (2) the high level waste packages, (3) failure of the tunnel seals, (4) failure of the spiral ramp seal, (5) flow path between a brine pocket and mine excavations, (6) less probable characteristics of radionuclide mobilization and transport, (7) and reduced long-term sealing by backfill. Model results show that when the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, no release of radionuclides is expected. Likewise, no release is expected in the six alternative scenarios, although differences exist in the extent to which radionuclides are able to travel within the geological disposal facility. These results indicate that the engineered barriers, combined with the natural barrier of the rock salt, are effective in isolating and providing containment during at the least the first million years after closure. • To demonstrate the safety of the Dutch COPERA disposal concept in rock salt, a safety assessment was performed. • In this safety assessment, seven scenarios were considered: the normal evolution scenario and six alternative scenarios. • Models show that no release is expected for at least one million years in both the normal evolution and the six alternative scenarios.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2025.100645
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety assessment for a geological disposal facility in domal salt: The Dutch case

Marja Vuorio, Jeroen Bartol
2 citations
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
2.61
article

Safety assessment for a geological disposal facility in domal salt: The Dutch case

Marja Vuorio, Jeroen Bartol
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the Netherlands, all radioactive waste is currently collected and stored above ground for at least 100 years by COVRA. After 100 years, all radioactive waste must be permanently disposed of. One option for permanent disposal currently considered is a purpose-built geological disposal facility in rock salt, where a combination of natural and engineered barriers is expected to provide the necessary safety. Rock salt, as a natural barrier, is considered impermeable when undisturbed. Therefore, radionuclides can only reach the surface via the mined openings of the geological disposal facility. Here, multiple engineered barriers provide the necessary safety. In the short term, these include concrete seals, HLW packages, and waste forms. In the long term, moisturized granular salt backfill provides containment. Here, we present the safety assessment of a geological disposal facility in rock salt, using the updated Dutch disposal concept and waste inventory. In total, seven different scenarios are modelled: the (1) normal evolution scenario in which the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, and six alternative scenarios: failure of (2) the high level waste packages, (3) failure of the tunnel seals, (4) failure of the spiral ramp seal, (5) flow path between a brine pocket and mine excavations, (6) less probable characteristics of radionuclide mobilization and transport, (7) and reduced long-term sealing by backfill. Model results show that when the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, no release of radionuclides is expected. Likewise, no release is expected in the six alternative scenarios, although differences exist in the extent to which radionuclides are able to travel within the geological disposal facility. These results indicate that the engineered barriers, combined with the natural barrier of the rock salt, are effective in isolating and providing containment during at the least the first million years after closure. • To demonstrate the safety of the Dutch COPERA disposal concept in rock salt, a safety assessment was performed. • In this safety assessment, seven scenarios were considered: the normal evolution scenario and six alternative scenarios. • Models show that no release is expected for at least one million years in both the normal evolution and the six alternative scenarios.

Geomechanics for Energy and the EnvironmentVol. 41
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.