Comparative assessment of global wood fiber and forest carbon sequestration prospects

We assessed the relative capacity of key global wood baskets in Latin America and Asia to determine their ability to meet increases in demands for pulp and paper, or to grow trees to store forest carbon. Drawing from the Trillion Trees proposal in 2020, a central aim of the research was to determine if a single country could plant an additional 10 million hectares (ha) by 2030. We analyzed secondary information from publicly available literature about the forest sector, forest plantations, and forest restoration in various countries. We screened land use types from the FAO data base to estimate forest restoration opportunities and compared those results with previous literature. These analyses helped determine the countries in Asia and Latin America with sufficient non-forested land (mainly shrub, herbaceous, or grassland areas) and the right environmental conditions to plant trees to meet the 10 million ha goal, or at least have good potential for large-scale tree planting. The study revealed that Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, Indonesia, India, Lao PDR, and Vietnam had the best prospects for large-scale afforestation and reforestation. Cambodia, Chile, Mexico, Myanmar, Paraguay, Thailand, and Uruguay also showed high potential based on the presence of large areas of grassland that might be suitable for tree planting. The research showed that while no single country is likely to plant 10 million ha of forests in the next decade, many could support hundreds of thousands or millions of ha, sufficient to support new pulp and paper mills, solid wood forest manufacturing, or major forest carbon plantings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forest Business Research
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62320/jfbr.v4i1.66
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of global wood fiber and forest carbon sequestration prospects

Bruno Kanieski da Silva, Frederick W. Cubbage, Jaana Korhonen, Prakash Nepal et al.
2 citations
Journal of Forest Business Research
Forest Management and Policy
2.21
article

Comparative assessment of global wood fiber and forest carbon sequestration prospects

Bruno Kanieski da Silva, Frederick W. Cubbage, Jaana Korhonen, Prakash Nepal, Robert R. Davis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We assessed the relative capacity of key global wood baskets in Latin America and Asia to determine their ability to meet increases in demands for pulp and paper, or to grow trees to store forest carbon. Drawing from the Trillion Trees proposal in 2020, a central aim of the research was to determine if a single country could plant an additional 10 million hectares (ha) by 2030. We analyzed secondary information from publicly available literature about the forest sector, forest plantations, and forest restoration in various countries. We screened land use types from the FAO data base to estimate forest restoration opportunities and compared those results with previous literature. These analyses helped determine the countries in Asia and Latin America with sufficient non-forested land (mainly shrub, herbaceous, or grassland areas) and the right environmental conditions to plant trees to meet the 10 million ha goal, or at least have good potential for large-scale tree planting. The study revealed that Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, Indonesia, India, Lao PDR, and Vietnam had the best prospects for large-scale afforestation and reforestation. Cambodia, Chile, Mexico, Myanmar, Paraguay, Thailand, and Uruguay also showed high potential based on the presence of large areas of grassland that might be suitable for tree planting. The research showed that while no single country is likely to plant 10 million ha of forests in the next decade, many could support hundreds of thousands or millions of ha, sufficient to support new pulp and paper mills, solid wood forest manufacturing, or major forest carbon plantings.

Journal of Forest Business ResearchVol. 4(1)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Georgia (US), Southern Research Station (US), Forest Products Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Forest Management and Policy
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.