Simulated daylight vs. conventional <scp>PDT</scp> for clinical superficial <scp>BCC</scp> : A randomized controlled trial
SDL-PDT is less effective than C-PDT but is also less painful. Due to the lower clearance rate, this study does not support SDL-PDT as a primary treatment option for sBCC. The randomized controlled trial was registered at http://www.researchweb.org/ (project 264721).
Authors
- E. Bäckman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0454-5644)
- Magdalena Claeson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5021-323X)
- Alexandra Sjöholm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-9291)
- Maja Modin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9743-4450)
- John Paoli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1326-8535)
- Julia Fougelberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3433-5557)
Institutions
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Region Västra Götaland (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Published
- 2025-02-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20602
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.35