Pisanie jako badanie. Tworzenie narracji historycznej jako element procesu badawczego

The article argues that writing is not a result but an integral part of historical research. Based on findings from the field of history education and good practices of public history, it aims to deconstruct the process of forging a historiographical narrative, from formulating the claim and arguments to the final, publishable version of the manuscript. It discusses the issues of adequate contextualization of the source analysis that should take into consideration both state of the art academic standards and readers’ prior knowledge as well as their cognitive potential and expectations. A meticulous editing process is also regarded as part of research (not just post‑processing), involving teamwork or outsourcing, where critical feedback helps identify loopholes in the process of research design, of building arguments and drawing conclusions. If skillfully implemented, it should strengthen the communicative power of the manuscript and enhance its outreach. The opportunities offered by artificial intelligence (AI) in this process are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24425/hsm.2024.153696
Primary Topic
Education and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pisanie jako badanie. Tworzenie narracji historycznej jako element procesu badawczego

Joanna Wojdon
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne
Education and Cultural Studies
article

Pisanie jako badanie. Tworzenie narracji historycznej jako element procesu badawczego

Joanna Wojdon
article en

Abstract

The article argues that writing is not a result but an integral part of historical research. Based on findings from the field of history education and good practices of public history, it aims to deconstruct the process of forging a historiographical narrative, from formulating the claim and arguments to the final, publishable version of the manuscript. It discusses the issues of adequate contextualization of the source analysis that should take into consideration both state of the art academic standards and readers’ prior knowledge as well as their cognitive potential and expectations. A meticulous editing process is also regarded as part of research (not just post‑processing), involving teamwork or outsourcing, where critical feedback helps identify loopholes in the process of research design, of building arguments and drawing conclusions. If skillfully implemented, it should strengthen the communicative power of the manuscript and enhance its outreach. The opportunities offered by artificial intelligence (AI) in this process are also discussed.

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne
University of Wrocław (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Education and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pisanie jako badanie. Tworzenie narracji historycznej jako element procesu badawczego — Joanna Wojdon · Historyka Studia Metodologiczne (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS