A continuous adjoint cut‐cell formulation for topology optimization of bi‐fluid heat exchangers

Purpose This paper aims to present a topology optimization (TopO) method for designing heat exchangers (HEx) with two working fluids to be kept apart. The introduction of cut–cells gives rise to the cut-cell TopO method, which computes the optimal distribution of an artificial impermeability field and successfully overcomes the weaknesses of the standard density-based TopO (denTopO) by computing the fluid–solid interface (FSI) at each cycle. This allows to accurately solve the flow and conjugate heat transfer (CHT) problem by imposing exact boundary conditions on the computed FSI and results to correct performances computed without the need to re-evaluate the optimized solutions on a body-fitted grid. Design/methodology/approach The elements of an artificial impermeability distribution field defined on a background grid act as the design variables and allow topological changes to take place. Post-processing them yields two fields indicating the location of the two flow streams inside the HEx. At each TopO cycle, the FSIs computed based on these two fields are used as the cutting surfaces of the cut-cell grid. On the so-computed grid, the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, coupled with the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model, and the temperature equation are solved. The derivatives of the objective and constraint functions with respect to the design variables of TopO are computed by the continuous adjoint method, using consistent discretization schemes devised thanks to the “Think Discrete – Do Continuous” (TDDC) adjoint methodology. Findings The effectiveness of the cut-cell–based TopO method for designing HEx is demonstrated in 2D parallel/counter flow and 3D counter flow HEx operating under both laminar and turbulent flow conditions. Compared to the standard denTopO, its ability to compute FSIs along which accurate boundary conditions are imposed, increases the accuracy of the flow solver, which usually leads to optimal, rather than sub-optimal, solutions that truly satisfy the imposed constraints. Originality/value This work proposes a new/complete methodology for the TopO of two-fluid systems including CHT that relies on the cut-cell method. This successfully combines aspects from both TopO and Shape Optimization (ShpO) in a single framework thus overcoming the well-known downsides of standard denTopO regarding its accuracy or the need for a follow-up ShpO after TopO. Instead of adding the well-known Brinkman penalization terms into the flow equations, it computes the FSIs at each optimization cycle allowing the solution of the CHT problem on a cut-cell grid.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid Flow
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/hff-08-2024-0642
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Topology Optimization in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A continuous adjoint cut‐cell formulation for topology optimization of bi‐fluid heat exchangers

Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou, Νικόλαος Γαλανός, E.M. Papoutsis‐Kiachagias
3 citations
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid Flow
Topology Optimization in Engineering
2.86
article

A continuous adjoint cut‐cell formulation for topology optimization of bi‐fluid heat exchangers

Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou, Νικόλαος Γαλανός, E.M. Papoutsis‐Kiachagias
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present a topology optimization (TopO) method for designing heat exchangers (HEx) with two working fluids to be kept apart. The introduction of cut–cells gives rise to the cut-cell TopO method, which computes the optimal distribution of an artificial impermeability field and successfully overcomes the weaknesses of the standard density-based TopO (denTopO) by computing the fluid–solid interface (FSI) at each cycle. This allows to accurately solve the flow and conjugate heat transfer (CHT) problem by imposing exact boundary conditions on the computed FSI and results to correct performances computed without the need to re-evaluate the optimized solutions on a body-fitted grid. Design/methodology/approach The elements of an artificial impermeability distribution field defined on a background grid act as the design variables and allow topological changes to take place. Post-processing them yields two fields indicating the location of the two flow streams inside the HEx. At each TopO cycle, the FSIs computed based on these two fields are used as the cutting surfaces of the cut-cell grid. On the so-computed grid, the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, coupled with the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model, and the temperature equation are solved. The derivatives of the objective and constraint functions with respect to the design variables of TopO are computed by the continuous adjoint method, using consistent discretization schemes devised thanks to the “Think Discrete – Do Continuous” (TDDC) adjoint methodology. Findings The effectiveness of the cut-cell–based TopO method for designing HEx is demonstrated in 2D parallel/counter flow and 3D counter flow HEx operating under both laminar and turbulent flow conditions. Compared to the standard denTopO, its ability to compute FSIs along which accurate boundary conditions are imposed, increases the accuracy of the flow solver, which usually leads to optimal, rather than sub-optimal, solutions that truly satisfy the imposed constraints. Originality/value This work proposes a new/complete methodology for the TopO of two-fluid systems including CHT that relies on the cut-cell method. This successfully combines aspects from both TopO and Shape Optimization (ShpO) in a single framework thus overcoming the well-known downsides of standard denTopO regarding its accuracy or the need for a follow-up ShpO after TopO. Instead of adding the well-known Brinkman penalization terms into the flow equations, it computes the FSIs at each optimization cycle allowing the solution of the CHT problem on a cut-cell grid.

International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid FlowVol. 35(6)
National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Topology Optimization in Engineering
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.