Impact of Non-Landslide Sample Sampling Strategies and Model Selection on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

This study investigated the influence of non-landslide sampling strategies on landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA) performance and explored approaches to minimizing uncertainty in model selection. Five non-landslide sampling strategies were evaluated using the random forest (RF) model to generate landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) for each scenario. To assess the impact of these strategies, this study employed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, a confusion matrix, and various statistical indicators. Additionally, the mean susceptibility indices derived from the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), support vector machine (SVM), and RF models were analyzed to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing the uncertainty during model selection. The GBDT, SVM, and RF were selected for their ability to handle complex, nonlinear relationships in the data, superior generalization capability, effective mitigation of overfitting risks, high predictive performance, and robustness. The findings revealed that selecting non-landslide samples from slope units without landslides enhances accuracy and averaging across models mitigated the uncertainty associated with landslide susceptibility models. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that the non-landslide sample selection method significantly improved prediction accuracy, particularly when samples were drawn from very-low-susceptibility zones identified by pre-classified machine learning models. These results highlight the importance of refining sample selection strategies and integrating multiple machine learning models to improve the reliability and accuracy of landslide susceptibility assessments. This approach provides valuable insights for future research and practical applications in risk mitigation and disaster management by offering a more precise depiction of low-susceptibility areas, thereby reducing the occurrence of false positives in landslide prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042132
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Non-Landslide Sample Sampling Strategies and Model Selection on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

Ruiqing Niu, Ling Li, Weijun Jiang
11 citations
Applied Sciences
Landslides and related hazards
26.64
article

Impact of Non-Landslide Sample Sampling Strategies and Model Selection on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

Ruiqing Niu, Ling Li, Weijun Jiang
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of non-landslide sampling strategies on landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA) performance and explored approaches to minimizing uncertainty in model selection. Five non-landslide sampling strategies were evaluated using the random forest (RF) model to generate landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) for each scenario. To assess the impact of these strategies, this study employed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, a confusion matrix, and various statistical indicators. Additionally, the mean susceptibility indices derived from the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), support vector machine (SVM), and RF models were analyzed to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing the uncertainty during model selection. The GBDT, SVM, and RF were selected for their ability to handle complex, nonlinear relationships in the data, superior generalization capability, effective mitigation of overfitting risks, high predictive performance, and robustness. The findings revealed that selecting non-landslide samples from slope units without landslides enhances accuracy and averaging across models mitigated the uncertainty associated with landslide susceptibility models. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that the non-landslide sample selection method significantly improved prediction accuracy, particularly when samples were drawn from very-low-susceptibility zones identified by pre-classified machine learning models. These results highlight the importance of refining sample selection strategies and integrating multiple machine learning models to improve the reliability and accuracy of landslide susceptibility assessments. This approach provides valuable insights for future research and practical applications in risk mitigation and disaster management by offering a more precise depiction of low-susceptibility areas, thereby reducing the occurrence of false positives in landslide prediction.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(4)
China University of Geosciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Landslides and related hazards
26.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Non-Landslide Sample Sampling Strategies and Model Selection on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping — Ruiqing Niu, Ling Li, et al. · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS