Preservice teachers as curriculum deliverers or curriculum-makers? Exploring curriculum-making conceptions and opportunities in professional experiences

Abstract This paper explores the impact of ongoing performativity and accountability agendas in education which frame curriculum merely as a product for delivery and teachers more as ‘technicians’ rather than curriculum-makers. While research has explored the impact of such agendas on the realities of teachers’ curriculum experiences within schools, further insight is needed on the implications for initial teacher education and preservice teachers’ developing curriculum identities. Focusing initially on a collective group of Australian preservice teachers, this study explores their conceptualisations of and aspirations for curriculum-making as part of their future classroom practice. By drawing on two in-depth cases from this collective, this study highlights the constrained nature of curriculum-making experiences during professional experience placements, and the implications this has for their capability development as aspirational curriculum-makers. The findings underscore the need for professional experience placement opportunities that foster preservice teachers’ development as active and critical curriculum-makers, rather than passive deliverers. Supporting these opportunities is paramount, especially in an educational landscape which seeks to de-professionalise the teaching profession further through the outsourcing of teachers’ curriculum thinking and expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00808-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preservice teachers as curriculum deliverers or curriculum-makers? Exploring curriculum-making conceptions and opportunities in professional experiences

P. R. Poulton
4 citations
The Australian Educational Researcher
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
16.81
article

Preservice teachers as curriculum deliverers or curriculum-makers? Exploring curriculum-making conceptions and opportunities in professional experiences

P. R. Poulton
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the impact of ongoing performativity and accountability agendas in education which frame curriculum merely as a product for delivery and teachers more as ‘technicians’ rather than curriculum-makers. While research has explored the impact of such agendas on the realities of teachers’ curriculum experiences within schools, further insight is needed on the implications for initial teacher education and preservice teachers’ developing curriculum identities. Focusing initially on a collective group of Australian preservice teachers, this study explores their conceptualisations of and aspirations for curriculum-making as part of their future classroom practice. By drawing on two in-depth cases from this collective, this study highlights the constrained nature of curriculum-making experiences during professional experience placements, and the implications this has for their capability development as aspirational curriculum-makers. The findings underscore the need for professional experience placement opportunities that foster preservice teachers’ development as active and critical curriculum-makers, rather than passive deliverers. Supporting these opportunities is paramount, especially in an educational landscape which seeks to de-professionalise the teaching profession further through the outsourcing of teachers’ curriculum thinking and expertise.

The Australian Educational ResearcherVol. 52(3)
RMIT University (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.