Multi-center decomposition of molecular densities: A numerical perspective

In this study, we analyze various Iterative Stockholder Analysis (ISA) methods for molecular density partitioning, focusing on the numerical performance of the recently proposed Linear approximation of Iterative Stockholder Analysis (LISA) model [Benda et al., J. Chem. Phys. 156, 164107 (2022)]. We first provide a systematic derivation of various iterative solvers to find the unique LISA solution. In a subsequent systematic numerical study, we evaluate their performance on 48 organic and inorganic, neutral and charged molecules and also compare LISA to two other well-known ISA variants: the Gaussian iterative stockholder analysis and Minimum Basis Iterative Stockholder analysis (MBIS). The study reveals that LISA-family methods can offer a numerically more efficient approach with better accuracy compared to the two comparative methods. Moreover, the well-known issue with the MBIS method, where atomic charges obtained for negatively charged molecules are anomalously negative, is not observed in LISA-family methods. Despite the fact that LISA occasionally exhibits elevated entropy as a consequence of the absence of more diffuse basis functions, this issue can be readily mitigated by incorporating additional or integrating supplementary basis functions within the LISA framework. This research provides the foundation for future studies on the efficiency and chemical accuracy of molecular density partitioning schemes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0245287
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-center decomposition of molecular densities: A numerical perspective

YingXing Cheng, Alston J. Misquitta, Benjamin Stamm, Virginie Ehrlacher et al.
3 citations
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
4.51
article

Multi-center decomposition of molecular densities: A numerical perspective

YingXing Cheng, Alston J. Misquitta, Benjamin Stamm, Virginie Ehrlacher, Éric Cancès
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In this study, we analyze various Iterative Stockholder Analysis (ISA) methods for molecular density partitioning, focusing on the numerical performance of the recently proposed Linear approximation of Iterative Stockholder Analysis (LISA) model [Benda et al., J. Chem. Phys. 156, 164107 (2022)]. We first provide a systematic derivation of various iterative solvers to find the unique LISA solution. In a subsequent systematic numerical study, we evaluate their performance on 48 organic and inorganic, neutral and charged molecules and also compare LISA to two other well-known ISA variants: the Gaussian iterative stockholder analysis and Minimum Basis Iterative Stockholder analysis (MBIS). The study reveals that LISA-family methods can offer a numerically more efficient approach with better accuracy compared to the two comparative methods. Moreover, the well-known issue with the MBIS method, where atomic charges obtained for negatively charged molecules are anomalously negative, is not observed in LISA-family methods. Despite the fact that LISA occasionally exhibits elevated entropy as a consequence of the absence of more diffuse basis functions, this issue can be readily mitigated by incorporating additional or integrating supplementary basis functions within the LISA framework. This research provides the foundation for future studies on the efficiency and chemical accuracy of molecular density partitioning schemes.

The Journal of Chemical PhysicsVol. 162(7)
University of Stuttgart (DE), Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas (FR), École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR), Queen Mary University of London (GB), CERMICS (FR)
UK Research and Innovation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
4.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.