Counterstereotypical Materials as a Method of Reducing Prejudice Toward Childfree People

Childfree people face prejudice, discrimination, and misunderstanding. This study explores three methods of reducing such prejudice based on video materials: counterstereotypicality (CS), exposition (EXPO), and counterstereotypical exposition (CS-EXPO). Prejudice was measured twice: first, in a pretest, and then in a posttest that followed the video material, two weeks afterwards. The study covered 192 participants (Mage = 30.18), with 46 to 50 participants in each condition (three experimental + one control). In all of the experimental conditions (but not in the control condition), the prejudice was lower in the Posttest, compared to the Pretest. Of the three conditions, the CS and CS-EXPO conditions had the largest effect. However, the results indicated no significant differences between the conditions. Practical implications for prejudice reduction campaigns are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Roczniki Psychologiczne
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych2024.0014
Primary Topic
Themes in Literature Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counterstereotypical Materials as a Method of Reducing Prejudice Toward Childfree People

Paweł Ciesielski
Roczniki Psychologiczne
Themes in Literature Analysis
article

Counterstereotypical Materials as a Method of Reducing Prejudice Toward Childfree People

Paweł Ciesielski
article en

Abstract

Childfree people face prejudice, discrimination, and misunderstanding. This study explores three methods of reducing such prejudice based on video materials: counterstereotypicality (CS), exposition (EXPO), and counterstereotypical exposition (CS-EXPO). Prejudice was measured twice: first, in a pretest, and then in a posttest that followed the video material, two weeks afterwards. The study covered 192 participants (Mage = 30.18), with 46 to 50 participants in each condition (three experimental + one control). In all of the experimental conditions (but not in the control condition), the prejudice was lower in the Posttest, compared to the Pretest. Of the three conditions, the CS and CS-EXPO conditions had the largest effect. However, the results indicated no significant differences between the conditions. Practical implications for prejudice reduction campaigns are discussed.

Roczniki PsychologiczneVol. 27(3)
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Themes in Literature Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.