Validation of the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) and a Comparison with the Recap of Atopic Eczema Questionnaire (RECAP)

The Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) has not been validated in the Dutch population, and comparisons with the Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) questionnaire are still lacking. This prospective study was conducted at a Dutch tertiary hospital between June 2021 and December 2022, to assess measurement properties of the Dutch ADCT in adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) and compare it with RECAP. Participants completed the ADCT, RECAP, and reference instruments including Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), quality-of-life questionnaire of the EuroQol Group (EQ-5D-5L), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) peak itch/sleep disturbance, Skindex-29, and Global Rating of Change (GRC), at baseline, 1-3 days, and 4-12 weeks. Construct validity was assessed through a priori hypotheses, whilst reliability was evaluated with standard error of measurement (SEMagreement) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCagreement). Interpretability was examined using anchor-based approaches. In total, 196 adults with AD were included. Among a priori hypotheses, 82% (single-score validity) and 59% (responsiveness) were confirmed. The SEMagreement was 1.15, and the ICCagreement was 0.983. The final bandings for the ADCT were established, with a binary cutoff of ≥ 6 indicating uncontrolled AD. The smallest detectable change (SDC) was 3.2, and the minimally important change (MIC) value from predictive modelling was 2.9. Furthermore, the ADCT exhibited high correlations with RECAP at all levels (most correlations being above 0.80). These results demonstrated the Dutch ADCT as a valid, reliable, and responsive tool, and have important clinical implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Dermato Venereologica
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.42364
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) and a Comparison with the Recap of Atopic Eczema Questionnaire (RECAP)

Laura Loman, Aviël Ragamin, Junfen Zhang, Jart A. F. Oosterhaven et al.
1 citations
Acta Dermato Venereologica
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
2.00
article

Validation of the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) and a Comparison with the Recap of Atopic Eczema Questionnaire (RECAP)

Laura Loman, Aviël Ragamin, Junfen Zhang, Jart A. F. Oosterhaven, Marie L. A. Schuttelaar, Leon A Miltner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) has not been validated in the Dutch population, and comparisons with the Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) questionnaire are still lacking. This prospective study was conducted at a Dutch tertiary hospital between June 2021 and December 2022, to assess measurement properties of the Dutch ADCT in adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) and compare it with RECAP. Participants completed the ADCT, RECAP, and reference instruments including Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), quality-of-life questionnaire of the EuroQol Group (EQ-5D-5L), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) peak itch/sleep disturbance, Skindex-29, and Global Rating of Change (GRC), at baseline, 1-3 days, and 4-12 weeks. Construct validity was assessed through a priori hypotheses, whilst reliability was evaluated with standard error of measurement (SEMagreement) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCagreement). Interpretability was examined using anchor-based approaches. In total, 196 adults with AD were included. Among a priori hypotheses, 82% (single-score validity) and 59% (responsiveness) were confirmed. The SEMagreement was 1.15, and the ICCagreement was 0.983. The final bandings for the ADCT were established, with a binary cutoff of ≥ 6 indicating uncontrolled AD. The smallest detectable change (SDC) was 3.2, and the minimally important change (MIC) value from predictive modelling was 2.9. Furthermore, the ADCT exhibited high correlations with RECAP at all levels (most correlations being above 0.80). These results demonstrated the Dutch ADCT as a valid, reliable, and responsive tool, and have important clinical implications.

Acta Dermato VenereologicaVol. 105
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
2.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.