Climate Models Struggle to Simulate Observed North Pacific Jet Trends, Even Accounting for Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Trends

Abstract We show that the wintertime (December‐January‐February) North Pacific jet in ERA5 has shifted northwards over the satellite‐era (1979–2023) at a faster rate than any of the state‐of‐the‐art coupled climate models used in this study. Differences in tropical sea surface temperature (SST) trends can only partially explain the discrepancy in jet trends between models and observations and a small minority of simulations forced with observed SSTs match the magnitude of the observed jet trend. However, analysis of longer‐term jet variability in reanalysis suggests that the jet trend has not clearly emerged from multi‐decadal internal climate variability. Consequently, it is unclear whether the difference in observed and modeled jet trends arises due to differing responses to anthropogenic forcing or overly weak long‐term internal variability in models. These results have important implications for future climate projections for North America and motivate further research into the underlying causes of long‐term jet trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl113561
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Models Struggle to Simulate Observed North Pacific Jet Trends, Even Accounting for Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Trends

Matthew Patterson, Christopher O’Reilly
6 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
6.63
article

Climate Models Struggle to Simulate Observed North Pacific Jet Trends, Even Accounting for Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Trends

Matthew Patterson, Christopher O’Reilly
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract We show that the wintertime (December‐January‐February) North Pacific jet in ERA5 has shifted northwards over the satellite‐era (1979–2023) at a faster rate than any of the state‐of‐the‐art coupled climate models used in this study. Differences in tropical sea surface temperature (SST) trends can only partially explain the discrepancy in jet trends between models and observations and a small minority of simulations forced with observed SSTs match the magnitude of the observed jet trend. However, analysis of longer‐term jet variability in reanalysis suggests that the jet trend has not clearly emerged from multi‐decadal internal climate variability. Consequently, it is unclear whether the difference in observed and modeled jet trends arises due to differing responses to anthropogenic forcing or overly weak long‐term internal variability in models. These results have important implications for future climate projections for North America and motivate further research into the underlying causes of long‐term jet trends.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(4)
University of Reading (GB)
Royal Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate variability and models
6.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate Models Struggle to Simulate Observed North Pacific Jet Trends, Even Accounting for Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Trends — Matthew Patterson, Christopher O’Reilly · Geophysical Research Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS