The Performance of a Rapid Coronavirus Disease 2019 Antigen Test in Rural Gabon

Access to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing is limited in rural sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the performance of the Siemens CLINITEST® rapid coronavirus disease 2019 antigen test under real-life conditions during the pandemic in rural Gabon. From August 2021 to February 2022, 277 participants were tested in Sindara and Lambaréné, Gabon, via outpatient mobile services. Of these participants, 54.6% were female, with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range: 12-55). The test performance was analyzed for the main population and for SARS-CoV-2 infected sub-populations at both study sites (Lambaréné and Sindara). We further evaluated subpopulations with higher viral loads using a cycle threshold (Ct) value restricted to <35, 30, 25, and 20. Overall test sensitivity in the main population was 33.3% (95% CI: 23.6-44.3%), improving to 83.3% (95% CI: 35.9-99.6%) with a Ct value of <20. Specificity across all populations was 100% (190/190; 95% CI: 98.1-100%). The prevalence of polymerase chain reaction-defined SARS-CoV-2 was 31.4%. The positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI: 88.1-100%), and negative predictive value was 76.6% (95% CI: 70.8-81.7%). Sensitivity in Sindara was 71.4% (95% CI: 29-96.3%) and 30% (95% CI: 20.3-41.3%) in Lambaréné. The Siemens CLINITEST® demonstrated high specificity but low sensitivity overall. However, it exceeded the WHO-defined quality criteria of 80% in participants with high viral loads, making it a useful tool in resource-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0230
Citations
1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Performance of a Rapid Coronavirus Disease 2019 Antigen Test in Rural Gabon

Rella Zoleko‐Manego, Ghyslain Mombo‐Ngoma, Dearie Glory Okwu, Maradona Daouda Agbanrin et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.40
article

The Performance of a Rapid Coronavirus Disease 2019 Antigen Test in Rural Gabon

Rella Zoleko‐Manego, Ghyslain Mombo‐Ngoma, Dearie Glory Okwu, Maradona Daouda Agbanrin, Johannes Mischlinger, Saskia Dede Davi, Sélidji Todagbé Agnandji, Lillian Rene Endamne, Rafiou Adamou, Michael Ramharter, Ayôla Akim Adégnika, Teite Rebecca Hildebrandt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Access to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing is limited in rural sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the performance of the Siemens CLINITEST® rapid coronavirus disease 2019 antigen test under real-life conditions during the pandemic in rural Gabon. From August 2021 to February 2022, 277 participants were tested in Sindara and Lambaréné, Gabon, via outpatient mobile services. Of these participants, 54.6% were female, with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range: 12-55). The test performance was analyzed for the main population and for SARS-CoV-2 infected sub-populations at both study sites (Lambaréné and Sindara). We further evaluated subpopulations with higher viral loads using a cycle threshold (Ct) value restricted to <35, 30, 25, and 20. Overall test sensitivity in the main population was 33.3% (95% CI: 23.6-44.3%), improving to 83.3% (95% CI: 35.9-99.6%) with a Ct value of <20. Specificity across all populations was 100% (190/190; 95% CI: 98.1-100%). The prevalence of polymerase chain reaction-defined SARS-CoV-2 was 31.4%. The positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI: 88.1-100%), and negative predictive value was 76.6% (95% CI: 70.8-81.7%). Sensitivity in Sindara was 71.4% (95% CI: 29-96.3%) and 30% (95% CI: 20.3-41.3%) in Lambaréné. The Siemens CLINITEST® demonstrated high specificity but low sensitivity overall. However, it exceeded the WHO-defined quality criteria of 80% in participants with high viral loads, making it a useful tool in resource-limited settings.

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and HygieneVol. 112(5)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Centre de Recherche Médicales de Lambaréné (GA), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), German Center for Infection Research (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.