Network Meta‐Analysis With Individual Participant‐Level Data of Time‐to‐Event Outcomes Using Cox Regression

The accessibility of individual participant-level data (IPD) enhances the evaluation of moderation effects of patient covariates. It facilitates the provision of accurate estimation of intervention effects and confidence intervals by incorporating covariate correlations across multiple clinical trials. With a time-to-event outcome, Cox regression can be applied for network meta-analysis (NMA) using IPD. However, there lacks comprehensive reviews and comparisons of the specifications and assumptions of these Cox models and their impact on the interpretation of hazard ratios, effect moderation, and trial heterogeneity in IPD-NMA. In this paper, we examine various Cox models for IPD-NMA and compare different approaches to modeling trial, treatment, and covariate effects. We employ multiple graphical tools and statistical tests to assess proportional hazard assumptions and discuss their implications. Additionally, we explore the application of extended Cox models when the proportional hazard assumption is violated. Practical guidance on interpreting and reporting NMA results is provided. A simulation study is conducted to compare the performance of different models. We illustrate the methods to conduct IPD-NMA through a real data example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70027
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network Meta‐Analysis With Individual Participant‐Level Data of Time‐to‐Event Outcomes Using Cox Regression

Kaiyuan Hua, Anthony Carnicelli, Hwanhee Hong, Xiaofei Wang et al.
4 citations
Statistics in Medicine
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
10.52
article

Network Meta‐Analysis With Individual Participant‐Level Data of Time‐to‐Event Outcomes Using Cox Regression

Kaiyuan Hua, Anthony Carnicelli, Hwanhee Hong, Xiaofei Wang, Christopher B. Granger, DANIEL M. WOJDYLA
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The accessibility of individual participant-level data (IPD) enhances the evaluation of moderation effects of patient covariates. It facilitates the provision of accurate estimation of intervention effects and confidence intervals by incorporating covariate correlations across multiple clinical trials. With a time-to-event outcome, Cox regression can be applied for network meta-analysis (NMA) using IPD. However, there lacks comprehensive reviews and comparisons of the specifications and assumptions of these Cox models and their impact on the interpretation of hazard ratios, effect moderation, and trial heterogeneity in IPD-NMA. In this paper, we examine various Cox models for IPD-NMA and compare different approaches to modeling trial, treatment, and covariate effects. We employ multiple graphical tools and statistical tests to assess proportional hazard assumptions and discuss their implications. Additionally, we explore the application of extended Cox models when the proportional hazard assumption is violated. Practical guidance on interpreting and reporting NMA results is provided. A simulation study is conducted to compare the performance of different models. We illustrate the methods to conduct IPD-NMA through a real data example.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(5)
Medical University of South Carolina (US), Duke University (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Duke Cancer Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Mental Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
10.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.