A watched pot seems slow to boil: Why frequent monitoring decreases perceptions of progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Psychology General
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001733
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A watched pot seems slow to boil: Why frequent monitoring decreases perceptions of progress.

Clayton R. Critcher, André Mata, André Vaz
1 citations
Journal of Experimental Psychology General
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
2.27
article

A watched pot seems slow to boil: Why frequent monitoring decreases perceptions of progress.

Clayton R. Critcher, André Mata, André Vaz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Journal of Experimental Psychology GeneralVol. 154(4)
University of Lisbon (PT), Ruhr University Bochum (DE), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A watched pot seems slow to boil: Why frequent monitoring decreases perceptions of progress. — Clayton R. Critcher, André Mata, et al. · Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS