World-wide oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC) meta-analysis leveraging individual patient data (IPD) from randomized trials (WOLVERINE): An analysis from the X-MET collaboration.

15 Background: Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for omPC has demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in multiple phase 2 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) yet has fallen short of demonstrating benefit for later endpoints. The X-MET collaboration amalgamates IPD from RCTs investigating oligometastatic cancers, incorporating new trials when published. Within X-MET, WOLVERINE combined IPD from all published omPC MDT RCTs. Methods: Trial search identified 5 omPC RCTs of MDT and standard of care (SOC) vs. SOC alone: STOMP (NCT01558427), ORIOLE (NCT02680587), ARTO (NCT03449719), SABR-COMET (NCT01446744), and EXTEND (continuous and intermittent androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] baskets; NCT03599765). IPD were retrieved for all trials. PFS was defined as biochemical or radiographic (RECIST 1.1) progression or death. Castration-resistance free survival (CRFS) was analyzed in castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) patients and was defined as development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) or death. Meta-analyses were conducted using fixed- and random-effects models to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs). As a complementary approach, HRs were computed utilizing Cox regression stratified by trial. The analysis plan was archived in Prospero: CRD4203479078. Results: This analysis included 472 patients, 224 randomized to SOC and 248 randomized to MDT+SOC, with a median follow-up of 41 mo. The majority were CSPC (58%), treated with ADT (74%) +/- androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI; 54%), and had a previously treated primary prostate (82%). For both analyses, MDT significantly improved PFS, radiographic PFS (rPFS), and CRFS (Table). Meta-analysis utilizing fixed- and random-effects yielded similar results. Overall survival (OS) was excellent in both arms (3- and 4-year OS: MDT+SOC 92% and 87% vs. SOC 86% and 75%) and exhibited near-significant association with MDT. The benefit of MDT for PFS persisted across most subgroups including castration status, prior primary treatment, staging imaging, and ADT/ARPI use (all HR < 0.52, all P < 0.05, all P[interaction] > 0.05). Conclusions: Leveraging IPD from all published omPC RCTs, WOLVERINE demonstrated for the first time a significant benefit of MDT for longer term endpoints including rPFS and CRFS, in addition to a near-significant association with OS. Furthermore, MDT benefit persisted across the entire omPC disease spectrum ranging from de novo to metachronous and CSPC to CRPC. Association between MDT and outcomes. Cox regression: HR (95% CI) Random-effects model: HR (95% CI) PFS 0.45 (0.35-0.58), P<0.0001 0.44 (0.35-0.57), P<0.0001 rPFS 0.59 (0.46-0.76), P<0.0001 0.60 (0.43-0.85), P=0.0039 CRFS 0.58 (0.37-0.91), P=0.020 0.58 (0.37-0.92), P=0.019 OS 0.64 (0.40-1.01), P=0.057 0.63 (0.39-1.004), P=0.051

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.15
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

World-wide oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC) meta-analysis leveraging individual patient data (IPD) from randomized trials (WOLVERINE): An analysis from the X-MET collaboration.

Jarey H. Wang, David E. Ost, Pierre Blanchard, Chad Z. Tang et al.
18 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
27.33
article

World-wide oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC) meta-analysis leveraging individual patient data (IPD) from randomized trials (WOLVERINE): An analysis from the X-MET collaboration.

Jarey H. Wang, David E. Ost, Pierre Blanchard, Chad Z. Tang, Alexander D. Sherry, Ana Maria Aparicio, Ryan Sun, Ethan B. Ludmir, Gabriele Simontacchi, Stephen Harrow, Giulio Francolini, Valérie Fonteyne, Paul G. Corn, Phuoc T. Tran, Ana P. Kiess, Hyunsoo Hwang, David A. Palma, Renée Bultijnck, Robert Olson, Lorenzo Livi
article en
18 citations

Abstract

15 Background: Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for omPC has demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in multiple phase 2 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) yet has fallen short of demonstrating benefit for later endpoints. The X-MET collaboration amalgamates IPD from RCTs investigating oligometastatic cancers, incorporating new trials when published. Within X-MET, WOLVERINE combined IPD from all published omPC MDT RCTs. Methods: Trial search identified 5 omPC RCTs of MDT and standard of care (SOC) vs. SOC alone: STOMP (NCT01558427), ORIOLE (NCT02680587), ARTO (NCT03449719), SABR-COMET (NCT01446744), and EXTEND (continuous and intermittent androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] baskets; NCT03599765). IPD were retrieved for all trials. PFS was defined as biochemical or radiographic (RECIST 1.1) progression or death. Castration-resistance free survival (CRFS) was analyzed in castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) patients and was defined as development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) or death. Meta-analyses were conducted using fixed- and random-effects models to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs). As a complementary approach, HRs were computed utilizing Cox regression stratified by trial. The analysis plan was archived in Prospero: CRD4203479078. Results: This analysis included 472 patients, 224 randomized to SOC and 248 randomized to MDT+SOC, with a median follow-up of 41 mo. The majority were CSPC (58%), treated with ADT (74%) +/- androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI; 54%), and had a previously treated primary prostate (82%). For both analyses, MDT significantly improved PFS, radiographic PFS (rPFS), and CRFS (Table). Meta-analysis utilizing fixed- and random-effects yielded similar results. Overall survival (OS) was excellent in both arms (3- and 4-year OS: MDT+SOC 92% and 87% vs. SOC 86% and 75%) and exhibited near-significant association with MDT. The benefit of MDT for PFS persisted across most subgroups including castration status, prior primary treatment, staging imaging, and ADT/ARPI use (all HR < 0.52, all P < 0.05, all P[interaction] > 0.05). Conclusions: Leveraging IPD from all published omPC RCTs, WOLVERINE demonstrated for the first time a significant benefit of MDT for longer term endpoints including rPFS and CRFS, in addition to a near-significant association with OS. Furthermore, MDT benefit persisted across the entire omPC disease spectrum ranging from de novo to metachronous and CSPC to CRPC. Association between MDT and outcomes. Cox regression: HR (95% CI) Random-effects model: HR (95% CI) PFS 0.45 (0.35-0.58), P<0.0001 0.44 (0.35-0.57), P<0.0001 rPFS 0.59 (0.46-0.76), P<0.0001 0.60 (0.43-0.85), P=0.0039 CRFS 0.58 (0.37-0.91), P=0.020 0.58 (0.37-0.92), P=0.019 OS 0.64 (0.40-1.01), P=0.057 0.63 (0.39-1.004), P=0.051

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), BC Cancer Agency (CA), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Cancer Care Ontario (CA), Western General Hospital (GB), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
27.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.