Toward Quantifying Interpolation Uncertainty in Set-Line Spacing Hydrographic Surveys

The oceans remain one of Earth’s last great unknowns, with about 74% still unmapped to modern standards. Consequently, interpolation is employed to create seamless digital bathymetric models (DBMs) from incomplete hydrographic datasets, but this introduces unquantified depth uncertainties. This study aims to estimate and characterize uncertainties arising from set-line spacing hydrographic surveys, which are important for nautical charting, navigational safety, and many other applications. By sampling four distinct complete-coverage testbeds in United States waters that vary in slope and roughness at different line spacings, this study interpolates across entire testbed areas using Spline, Inverse Distance Weighting, and Linear interpolation. Uncertainty is calculated by comparing interpolated depths against the source depths for independent points. The resulting interpolation uncertainties are evaluated from both scientific and operational perspectives. Linear regression and machine learning techniques, specifically artificial neural networks and random forest, are used to model the relationship between these uncertainties and three ancillary predictors (distance to the nearest known measurement, slope, and roughness) for interpolation uncertainty quantification. The results show operational equivalence among the three interpolators, how line spacing and morphology impact uncertainty, and the statistical significance of the examined uncertainty predictors. However, the relationships between the combined ancillary predictors and interpolation uncertainty are weak. These findings suggest the potential presence of unaccounted-for factors influencing uncertainty yet provide a foundational understanding for improving uncertainty estimates in DBMs within operational settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14020090
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Quantifying Interpolation Uncertainty in Set-Line Spacing Hydrographic Surveys

Christos Kastrisios, Elias Adediran, Kim Lowell, Glen Rice et al.
1 citations
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

Toward Quantifying Interpolation Uncertainty in Set-Line Spacing Hydrographic Surveys

Christos Kastrisios, Elias Adediran, Kim Lowell, Glen Rice, Qi Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The oceans remain one of Earth’s last great unknowns, with about 74% still unmapped to modern standards. Consequently, interpolation is employed to create seamless digital bathymetric models (DBMs) from incomplete hydrographic datasets, but this introduces unquantified depth uncertainties. This study aims to estimate and characterize uncertainties arising from set-line spacing hydrographic surveys, which are important for nautical charting, navigational safety, and many other applications. By sampling four distinct complete-coverage testbeds in United States waters that vary in slope and roughness at different line spacings, this study interpolates across entire testbed areas using Spline, Inverse Distance Weighting, and Linear interpolation. Uncertainty is calculated by comparing interpolated depths against the source depths for independent points. The resulting interpolation uncertainties are evaluated from both scientific and operational perspectives. Linear regression and machine learning techniques, specifically artificial neural networks and random forest, are used to model the relationship between these uncertainties and three ancillary predictors (distance to the nearest known measurement, slope, and roughness) for interpolation uncertainty quantification. The results show operational equivalence among the three interpolators, how line spacing and morphology impact uncertainty, and the statistical significance of the examined uncertainty predictors. However, the relationships between the combined ancillary predictors and interpolation uncertainty are weak. These findings suggest the potential presence of unaccounted-for factors influencing uncertainty yet provide a foundational understanding for improving uncertainty estimates in DBMs within operational settings.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationVol. 14(2)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), University of New Hampshire (US), NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (US)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.