Cabozantinib as subsequent therapy to an immune checkpoint-based therapy in renal cell carcinoma, phase 2 interventional study (AT ASIA, KCSG GU21-02).

547 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly advanced the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). However, many patients develop disease progression, underscoring the need for effective second-line therapies. The optimal sequencing after ICI-based treatment remains under investigation. This phase II study evaluates the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in patients with aRCC who progressed on first-line ICI combination therapies. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, phase II trial enrolled patients with advanced RCC who had progressed after receiving either nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Cohort 1) or a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in combination with a VEGFR-TKI (e.g., pembrolizumab plus axitinib or pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib; Cohort 2). Non-clear cell histology was allowed in Cohort 2. Eligible patients were treated with cabozantinib at standard dosing. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From September 2021 to August 2024, 88 patients (Cohort 1, n=49; Cohort 2, n=39) were enrolled across 13 institutions. The baseline International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk categories were as follows: favorable (15.9%), intermediate (71.6%), and poor (12.5%). Prior nephrectomy was reported in 42.0% of patients, and non-clear cell histology accounted for 20.5% of Cohort 2. After a median follow-up of 18.3 months (95% CI, 11.3–25.3), the ORR was 47.7%. Partial responses were observed in 51.0% (95% CI, 40.1–61.5) of patients in Cohort 1 (ICI-ICI) and 43.6% (95% CI, 30.5–56.8) in Cohort 2 (ICI-VEGFR-TKI). Stable disease was achieved in 43.2% of patients overall. The median PFS was 7.9 months, with a PFS of 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.6–11.8) in Cohort 1 and 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.7–7.6) in Cohort 2. No significant difference in OS was observed between the cohorts, with a 12-month OS rate of 65.2%. Safety analysis revealed no novel adverse events beyond the known cabozantinib toxicity profile, with grade 3/4 hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and fatigue being the most commonly reported events. Conclusions: Cabozantinib demonstrated substantial efficacy as a second-line treatment for advanced RCC following progression on ICI-based therapies, with a tolerable safety profile. These findings reinforce cabozantinib as an important treatment option for patients progressing after ICI regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT04714697 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.547
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cabozantinib as subsequent therapy to an immune checkpoint-based therapy in renal cell carcinoma, phase 2 interventional study (AT ASIA, KCSG GU21-02).

Inkeun Park, Il Hwan Kim, Sang Joon Shin, Woo Kyun Bae et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Cabozantinib as subsequent therapy to an immune checkpoint-based therapy in renal cell carcinoma, phase 2 interventional study (AT ASIA, KCSG GU21-02).

Inkeun Park, Il Hwan Kim, Sang Joon Shin, Woo Kyun Bae, Jae‐Lyun Lee, Hong Jae Chon, Kwonoh Park, Joo‐Hwan Park, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin Young Kim, In‐Ho Kim, Hyo Jin Lee, Shinkyo Yoon, Byoung Young Shim, Miso Kim
article en

Abstract

547 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly advanced the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). However, many patients develop disease progression, underscoring the need for effective second-line therapies. The optimal sequencing after ICI-based treatment remains under investigation. This phase II study evaluates the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in patients with aRCC who progressed on first-line ICI combination therapies. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, phase II trial enrolled patients with advanced RCC who had progressed after receiving either nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Cohort 1) or a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in combination with a VEGFR-TKI (e.g., pembrolizumab plus axitinib or pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib; Cohort 2). Non-clear cell histology was allowed in Cohort 2. Eligible patients were treated with cabozantinib at standard dosing. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From September 2021 to August 2024, 88 patients (Cohort 1, n=49; Cohort 2, n=39) were enrolled across 13 institutions. The baseline International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk categories were as follows: favorable (15.9%), intermediate (71.6%), and poor (12.5%). Prior nephrectomy was reported in 42.0% of patients, and non-clear cell histology accounted for 20.5% of Cohort 2. After a median follow-up of 18.3 months (95% CI, 11.3–25.3), the ORR was 47.7%. Partial responses were observed in 51.0% (95% CI, 40.1–61.5) of patients in Cohort 1 (ICI-ICI) and 43.6% (95% CI, 30.5–56.8) in Cohort 2 (ICI-VEGFR-TKI). Stable disease was achieved in 43.2% of patients overall. The median PFS was 7.9 months, with a PFS of 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.6–11.8) in Cohort 1 and 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.7–7.6) in Cohort 2. No significant difference in OS was observed between the cohorts, with a 12-month OS rate of 65.2%. Safety analysis revealed no novel adverse events beyond the known cabozantinib toxicity profile, with grade 3/4 hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and fatigue being the most commonly reported events. Conclusions: Cabozantinib demonstrated substantial efficacy as a second-line treatment for advanced RCC following progression on ICI-based therapies, with a tolerable safety profile. These findings reinforce cabozantinib as an important treatment option for patients progressing after ICI regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT04714697 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Ulsan College (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Chungnam National University (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Gachon University Gil Medical Center (KR), The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR), Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital (KR), CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR), Hanyang University Seoul Hospital (KR), Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (KR), CHA University (KR), Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Keimyung University (KR)
Ipsen
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.