ETCTN 10483: Phase Ib trial of erdafitinib (E) combined with enfortumab vedotin (EV) following platinum and PD-1/L1 inhibitors for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with FGFR3/2 genetic alterations (GAs).
808 Background: Erdafitinib (E) is an approved treatment in patients with mUCwith FGFR 3 GAs after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) is approved to treat patients with mUC following prior PBC and PD1/L1 inhibitors or as First-line therapy in combination with pembrolizumab. Retrospective studies suggest that the activity of EV is not compromised by FGFR 3/2 GAs. EV and erdafitinib have different mechanisms of activity and toxicities are mostly non-overlapping. Hence, there is rationale to evaluate the feasibility of combination EV and E, to overcome the difficulties of resistance and sequencing agents in mUC patients with FGFR 3/2 GAs. Methods: This is an ongoing, single arm, multicenter, Phase I, 3+3 design dose-escalation and expansion study of E+ EV combination evaluating the safety, tolerability, PK, and antitumor activity in patients with mUC harboring FGFR3/2 GAs who have progressed after platinum and/or PD1/L1 inhibitor therapies. Dose escalation phase aims to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of EV in combination with fixed dose of E at 8 mg/day (table). Results: As of data cutoff, 9 patients were enrolled and completed dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period (1 st cycle) in the dose-escalation phase. Six patients were enrolled at DL1 with 1 DLT (skin rash) and 3 at DL2 (no DLT). The most common all grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included hyperphosphatemia (88%), mucositis (88%), high AST (88%), hypercalcemia (75%), palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (75%), peripheral neuropathy (75%), alopecia (63%), diarrhea (63%), hypoalbuminemia (63%) and hypomagnesemia (63%). Grade 3 TRAEs included palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (50%), anemia (17%), rash (17%), anorexia (17%) and paronychia (17%). One patient developed grade 4 Stevens-Johnson syndrome related to EV which subsequently improved. PK data are available for all 6 patients in DL1. The average steady-state Cmin of E and MMAE was 1430 ± 639 ng/mL and 1.4 ± 0.9 ng/ml, respectively, and the average Cmax of MMAE was 3.9 ± 0.9 ng/mL at DL1. All 9 patients are evaluable with 100% best objective rate, including 8 partial responses (PRs) and 1 complete response (CR). The mOS was NR (95% 17.1 months-NR), mPFS was 7.52 months (95% CT 5.55-NR) with median follow up of 22.7 months. The mDOR is 5.49 months. The RP2D of EV is 1.25 mg/kg in combination with E at 8 mg/day. Conclusions: E+EV combination is feasible and preliminarily exhibits promising antitumor activity. Dose expansion is ongoing at RP2D dose of EV with E. Clinical trial information: NCT04963153 . Dose Level (DL) Dose Cycle Length E EV Level -1 8 mg PO QD 0.75 mg/kg IV (maximum dose 75 mg) D1,8,15 28 days Level 1 8 mg PO QD 1 mg/kg IV (maximum dose 100 mg) D1,8,15 Level 2 8 mg PO QD 1.25 mg/kg IV (maximum dose 125 mg) D1,8,15
Authors
- Faustine Ong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4442-2646)
- Scott T. Tagawa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-8587)
- Timothy W. Synold (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4075-2544)
- Waddah Arafat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6057-2348)
- Laura Graham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4371-572X)
- Rohit Jain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4905-462X)
- Monica Chatwal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0358-1993)
- Juskaran Chadha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-0147)
- Bishoy M. Faltas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-1693)
- Lorraine Pelosof
- Guru Sonpavde (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1010-9611)
- Yuanquan Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5209-9247)
- Jingsong Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-5116)
- Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2530-2756)
- Jazlyn Heiligh
- Di Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9795-6831)
- Youngchul Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-0330)
Institutions
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University Health Network (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Cornell University (US)
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- Florida Hospital Cancer Institute (US)
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- City of Hope (US)
- University of Colorado Cancer Center (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Beckman Research Institute
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2025-02-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.808
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.01