Peri-operative treatment patterns in real-world muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy in the era of adjuvant immunotherapy.

704 Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has traditionally been managed with radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection combined with neoadjuvant (NAD) and/or adjuvant (AD) chemotherapy in eligible patients. In late 2021, adjuvant nivolumab, was approved in the US among patients with certain high-risk of recurrence (HRR) features. Contemporary peri-operative treatment utilization patterns in MIBC patients post-RC is lacking. This study aimed to characterize demographics, clinical features, treatment patterns, and surgical outcomes, in a contemporary cohort of MIBC patients undergoing RC in the post-immunotherapy era. Methods: The US Syapse Learning Health Network Enriched Bladder Cancer Cohort, comprised of patients from community-based practices with cancer registry data supplemented and validated by chart review, was used to identify adults with clinically diagnosed MIBC (T2-T4aN0M0, T1-T4aN1M0) undergoing RC from February 19, 2021 (6-months prior to nivolumab approval) to December 31, 2023, with a minimum 6-month follow-up post-RC (except in cases of patient death). Patients with history of other primary cancer, non-bladder systemic antineoplastic therapies, prior partial cystectomy, NAD radiation, or clinical trial participation were excluded. Real-world HRR following resection was defined using a combination of NAD agent receipt and pathological staging (PS) from RC: received NAD cisplatin-based therapy and pT2-T4a or pN+; or, if patient did not receive NAD cisplatin-based therapy, pT3-4a or pN+. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as pT0N0. Results: Of 138 eligible patients, mean age was 66 years, and the majority were male (82%), white (83%), current/former smokers (68%), presented as de novo MIBC (97%), and had urothelial histology (91%). Overall, 49% (67/138) of patients received RC without NAD or AD treatment. Around 46% (64/138) received NAD chemotherapy; of these, one-third achieved pCR (20/61 NAD chemotherapy-treated patients with complete PS data post-RC). The most prevalent NAD regimens were cisplatin + gemcitabine (58%; 37/64) and methotrexate + vinblastine + doxorubicin + cisplatin (30%; 19/64). Only 14% (20/138) of all patients received AD treatment, with 10% (14/138) receiving AD nivolumab. Half of patients had HRR following resection (63/125 patients with complete PS data post-RC). Among the HRR subgroup, 22% (14/63) received AD treatment, with 19% (12/63) receiving nivolumab. Conclusions: In this contemporary cohort of MIBC patients undergoing RC, nearly half received NAD treatment (mainly gemcitabine and cisplatin) while there was limited use of AD treatment. Since FDA approval, AD nivolumab use was 10% among all RC-treated MIBC patients and less than a fifth among HRR patients (nivolumab eligible).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.704
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peri-operative treatment patterns in real-world muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy in the era of adjuvant immunotherapy.

Patrick Squires, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Xiaohan Hu, Connor Sweetnam et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
4.01
article

Peri-operative treatment patterns in real-world muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy in the era of adjuvant immunotherapy.

Patrick Squires, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Xiaohan Hu, Connor Sweetnam, Meng Ke, Yu-Han Kao, Ronac Mamtani, Chethan Ramamurthy, Haojie Li, Jennifer S. Stuart, Zara Wermers
article en
2 citations

Abstract

704 Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has traditionally been managed with radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection combined with neoadjuvant (NAD) and/or adjuvant (AD) chemotherapy in eligible patients. In late 2021, adjuvant nivolumab, was approved in the US among patients with certain high-risk of recurrence (HRR) features. Contemporary peri-operative treatment utilization patterns in MIBC patients post-RC is lacking. This study aimed to characterize demographics, clinical features, treatment patterns, and surgical outcomes, in a contemporary cohort of MIBC patients undergoing RC in the post-immunotherapy era. Methods: The US Syapse Learning Health Network Enriched Bladder Cancer Cohort, comprised of patients from community-based practices with cancer registry data supplemented and validated by chart review, was used to identify adults with clinically diagnosed MIBC (T2-T4aN0M0, T1-T4aN1M0) undergoing RC from February 19, 2021 (6-months prior to nivolumab approval) to December 31, 2023, with a minimum 6-month follow-up post-RC (except in cases of patient death). Patients with history of other primary cancer, non-bladder systemic antineoplastic therapies, prior partial cystectomy, NAD radiation, or clinical trial participation were excluded. Real-world HRR following resection was defined using a combination of NAD agent receipt and pathological staging (PS) from RC: received NAD cisplatin-based therapy and pT2-T4a or pN+; or, if patient did not receive NAD cisplatin-based therapy, pT3-4a or pN+. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as pT0N0. Results: Of 138 eligible patients, mean age was 66 years, and the majority were male (82%), white (83%), current/former smokers (68%), presented as de novo MIBC (97%), and had urothelial histology (91%). Overall, 49% (67/138) of patients received RC without NAD or AD treatment. Around 46% (64/138) received NAD chemotherapy; of these, one-third achieved pCR (20/61 NAD chemotherapy-treated patients with complete PS data post-RC). The most prevalent NAD regimens were cisplatin + gemcitabine (58%; 37/64) and methotrexate + vinblastine + doxorubicin + cisplatin (30%; 19/64). Only 14% (20/138) of all patients received AD treatment, with 10% (14/138) receiving AD nivolumab. Half of patients had HRR following resection (63/125 patients with complete PS data post-RC). Among the HRR subgroup, 22% (14/63) received AD treatment, with 19% (12/63) receiving nivolumab. Conclusions: In this contemporary cohort of MIBC patients undergoing RC, nearly half received NAD treatment (mainly gemcitabine and cisplatin) while there was limited use of AD treatment. Since FDA approval, AD nivolumab use was 10% among all RC-treated MIBC patients and less than a fifth among HRR patients (nivolumab eligible).

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Harvard University (US), Abramson Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.