Treatment patterns and survival outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the Brazilian population: LACOG 1818.

27 Background: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide. In Brazil, 75% of patients (pts) rely on the public healthcare system, where access to novel therapies is limited. This disparity may lead to significant differences in survival outcomes. The LACOG 1818 study aims to address this gap by evaluating survival outcomes and treatment patterns among Brazilian pts diagnosed with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in different healthcare settings (public versus private). Methods: LACOG 1818 is a retrospective cohort that included Brazilian pts from 18 research sites diagnosed with mCRPC between Jan 2014 and Dec 2017. Data on pts demographics, clinicopathological features, treatment patterns, and overall survival (OS) were collected from medical records. The primary endpoint was cause-specific survival (CSS) estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between groups (public vs. private healthcare) were assessed by chi-square and the log-rank tests. Results: From Jan 2020 to Jan 2022, 582 eligible pts were included. The median age was 49 (26-53) years, 259 (45%) were white and 85 (15%) were black/brown. Most had bone metastases (n=499, 86%), followed by non-regional lymph-nodes (n=239, 41%). A total of 323 (55%) pts had public and 259 (45%) had private health coverage. The main modality of castration was biochemical castration (n=442, 76% [public 60% vs. private 96%; p<0.0001]), followed by bilateral orchiectomy (n=140, 24% [public 40% vs. private 4%; p<0.0001]). 499 pts had available data on systemic treatment for mCRPC: 473 (95%) received first line; 247 (49%) second line; and 147 (29%) ≥ 3 lines. 378 (65%) pts received a bone protector agent (63% in public vs. 68% in private; p <0.001). At median follow-up of 59 months (95% CI 54.3-62.1), median OS was 57.1 months (95% CI 47.0-65.2) in overall sample; 44.8 months (95% CI 36.0-57.1) in public versus 65.7 months (95% CI 59.8-79.1) in private (HR 1.4 [95%IC 1.1-1.8] p=0.0051). The median CSS was 73.8 months (95% CI 55.1.-NR) in public versus 102.4 months (95% CI 83.4-102.4) in private (HR 1.9 [95%IC 1.4-2.6] p<0.0001). Conclusions: LACOG 1818 study demonstrated significant disparities in treatment patterns and survival outcomes between public and private settings for Brazilian pts with mCRPC. Pts with private coverage had longer OS and CSS. These findings underscore the need for improved access to novel therapies and comprehensive cancer care in Brazil's public healthcare system to reduce survival disparities. Clinical trial information: NCT04962919 . Private Public P First-line N=221 N= 251 <0.0001 ARPI 132 (60%) 18 (7%) Antiandrogen 30 (13%) 127(51%) Chemotherapy 59 (27%) 106 (42%) Second-line N=132 N=110 <0.0001 ARPI 75 (57%) 25 (23%) Antiandrogen 5 (4%) 22 (20%) Chemotherapy 52 (39%) 63 (57%) ARPI= Antiandrogen receptor pathways inhibitor. Antiandrogen= bicalutamide, flutamide, cyproterone and DES.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.27
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the Brazilian population: LACOG 1818.

Andrey Coatrini Soares, Deusdedit Cortêz Vieira da Silva Neto, Roberto Odebrecht Rocha, Diogo Assed Bastos et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the Brazilian population: LACOG 1818.

Andrey Coatrini Soares, Deusdedit Cortêz Vieira da Silva Neto, Roberto Odebrecht Rocha, Diogo Assed Bastos, Cristina de Deus Anjos Tavares Sampaio, Patrícia Barrios, Ana Caroline Fonseca Alves, Gustavo Gössling, Daniel M. Girardi, Andréa Lopes Ponte de Souza, André P. Fay, Douglas Dias e Silva, Aline Bobato Lara Gongora, Thiago Lins da Costa Almeida, Daniel Vilarim Araújo, José Augusto Rinck, Augusto C. A. Mota, Fernando Cotait Maluf, Suelen Patrícia dos Santos Martins, Tainá Cabalheiro
article en

Abstract

27 Background: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide. In Brazil, 75% of patients (pts) rely on the public healthcare system, where access to novel therapies is limited. This disparity may lead to significant differences in survival outcomes. The LACOG 1818 study aims to address this gap by evaluating survival outcomes and treatment patterns among Brazilian pts diagnosed with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in different healthcare settings (public versus private). Methods: LACOG 1818 is a retrospective cohort that included Brazilian pts from 18 research sites diagnosed with mCRPC between Jan 2014 and Dec 2017. Data on pts demographics, clinicopathological features, treatment patterns, and overall survival (OS) were collected from medical records. The primary endpoint was cause-specific survival (CSS) estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between groups (public vs. private healthcare) were assessed by chi-square and the log-rank tests. Results: From Jan 2020 to Jan 2022, 582 eligible pts were included. The median age was 49 (26-53) years, 259 (45%) were white and 85 (15%) were black/brown. Most had bone metastases (n=499, 86%), followed by non-regional lymph-nodes (n=239, 41%). A total of 323 (55%) pts had public and 259 (45%) had private health coverage. The main modality of castration was biochemical castration (n=442, 76% [public 60% vs. private 96%; p<0.0001]), followed by bilateral orchiectomy (n=140, 24% [public 40% vs. private 4%; p<0.0001]). 499 pts had available data on systemic treatment for mCRPC: 473 (95%) received first line; 247 (49%) second line; and 147 (29%) ≥ 3 lines. 378 (65%) pts received a bone protector agent (63% in public vs. 68% in private; p <0.001). At median follow-up of 59 months (95% CI 54.3-62.1), median OS was 57.1 months (95% CI 47.0-65.2) in overall sample; 44.8 months (95% CI 36.0-57.1) in public versus 65.7 months (95% CI 59.8-79.1) in private (HR 1.4 [95%IC 1.1-1.8] p=0.0051). The median CSS was 73.8 months (95% CI 55.1.-NR) in public versus 102.4 months (95% CI 83.4-102.4) in private (HR 1.9 [95%IC 1.4-2.6] p<0.0001). Conclusions: LACOG 1818 study demonstrated significant disparities in treatment patterns and survival outcomes between public and private settings for Brazilian pts with mCRPC. Pts with private coverage had longer OS and CSS. These findings underscore the need for improved access to novel therapies and comprehensive cancer care in Brazil's public healthcare system to reduce survival disparities. Clinical trial information: NCT04962919 . Private Public P First-line N=221 N= 251 <0.0001 ARPI 132 (60%) 18 (7%) Antiandrogen 30 (13%) 127(51%) Chemotherapy 59 (27%) 106 (42%) Second-line N=132 N=110 <0.0001 ARPI 75 (57%) 25 (23%) Antiandrogen 5 (4%) 22 (20%) Chemotherapy 52 (39%) 63 (57%) ARPI= Antiandrogen receptor pathways inhibitor. Antiandrogen= bicalutamide, flutamide, cyproterone and DES.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (BR), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR), Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (BR), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Hospital de Base (BR), AC Camargo Hospital (BR), Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (BR), Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (BR), Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (BR), Hospital Napoleão Laureano (BR), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão (BR), Hospital Infantil Joana de Gusmão (BR), Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS (BR), Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (BR), Hospital Santa Marcelina (BR), Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR), Hospital de Base (BR), Centro de Pesquisas Oncológicas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.