The Relationship Between Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss and Resonance Frequency Analysis
Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) has been used as a diagnostic method to measure implant stability at all stages of healing. In addition to evaluating the status of the peri-implant marginal bone, it can also indicate the most appropriate time to load the implant. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of RFA as a diagnostic method for the detection of peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL). Forty bone-level Klockner Vega implants were placed in a polyurethane block with elastic properties similar to those of the maxillary bone. The insertion torque and primary implant stability at the time of placement were measured using an RFA device. A circumferential peri-implant defect was created by removing the cortical bone portion in each implant using a trephine. The stability values were measured again using RFA. The stability values measured using RFA were lower after the creation of the circumferential peri-implant defect, indicating a statistically significant decrease in implant stability. The results of the study tend to show a relationship between peri-implant marginal bone loss and modifications in implant stability measured by RFA.
Authors
- David Chávarri‐Prado (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3670-3424)
- Aritza Brizuela‐Velasco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6421-3863)
- Markel Diéguez-Pereira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5844-6596)
- Esteban Pérez-Pevida (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3523-5972)
- Miguel Beltrán-Guijarro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6157-2308)
- Alejandro Estrada-Martínez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-1874)
- Iván Monteagudo-Villalobos
Institutions
- Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
- Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
- Universidad Europea Miguel de Cervantes (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Functional Biomaterials
- Published
- 2025-02-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16020071
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.58