Real-world comparison of cabazitaxel vs. 177-lutetium-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

70 Background: 177-Lutetium Prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) therapy is under current scientific investigation and aims to become an established part in treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world evidence in treatment comparison is scant. Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared cabazitaxel vs. Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients regarding progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed 2 nd to 4 th line mCRPC patients to approximate current Phase-III patient selection criteria. Results: Of 373 mCRPC patients, 14% received cabazitaxel vs. 65% Lu-PSMA vs. 21% both. Patients undergoing Lu-PSMA therapy were significantly older (median 72 vs. 66 years, p&lt;0.01) and displayed a higher proportion of ECOG ≥2 (12 vs. 5.0%, p=0.1), relative to cabazitaxel patients. Rates of PSA50 were 32% vs. 0% for Lu-PSMA vs. cabazitaxel. In outcome analyses, significant superior median PFS was observed for Lu-PSMA vs. cabazitaxel (13.4 vs. 7.1 months, p&lt;0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.38, p&lt;0.001). Regarding OS, rates also significantly differed with median OS of 14.7 vs. 16.5 vs. 29.6 months for cabazitaxel vs. Lu-PSMA vs. both treatments (p&lt;0.01). In sensitivity analyses of 2 nd to 4 th line mCRPC, PFS rates and median OS rates for cabazitaxel vs. Lu-PSMA vs. both therapies qualitatively remained the same compared to the entire cohort. Conclusions: In real-world setting, Lu-PSMA provides significantly better PFS and qualitatively better OS rates compared to cabazitaxel chemotherapy and should therefore be considered as a valuable treatment option for advanced mCRPC patients according to the EMA-approval. Characteristics of 296 metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients stratified according to treatment of cabazitaxel vs. 177 - Lutetium- prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (Lu-PSMA). Characteristic N Overall,N = 296 1 CabazitaxelN = 52 (18%) 1 Lu-PSMA,N = 244 (82%) 1 p-value 2 Age at mCRPC, years 192 71 (64, 76) 66 (58, 71) 72 (66, 78) &lt;0.001 PSA at m CRPC, ng/ml 141 18 (6, 72) 63 (12, 144) 15 (6, 64) 0.044 Number of CRPC lines 296 3 (2, 4) 4 (3, 5) 3 (2, 4) &lt;0.001 Cycles systemic treatment 229 3 (2, 6) 5 (3, 6) 3 (2, 6) 0.031 PSA response, % 39 20 (0, 66) 15 (0, 23) 25 (0, 68) 0.3 PSA50 39 11 (28%) 0 (0%) 11 (32%) 0.3 PSA90 39 5 (13%) 0 (0%) 5 (15%) 0.9 ECOG status at mCRPC 109 0.10 0 52 (48%) 14 (70%) 38 (43%) 1 45 (41%) 5 (25%) 40 (45%) &gt;=2 12 (11%) 1 (5%) 11 (12%) Cardiovascular disease 183 <jats:td colsp

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.70
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world comparison of cabazitaxel vs. 177-lutetium-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

Daniel Groener, Markus Graefen, Carolin Siech, Thomas Steuber et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Real-world comparison of cabazitaxel vs. 177-lutetium-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

Daniel Groener, Markus Graefen, Carolin Siech, Thomas Steuber, Tobias Maurer, Nicolai Mader, Séverine Banek, Clara Humke, Florestan Koll, Philipp Mandel, Mike Wenzel, Felix H. K. Chun, Christian Brandts, Benedikt Hoeh
article en

Abstract

70 Background: 177-Lutetium Prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) therapy is under current scientific investigation and aims to become an established part in treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world evidence in treatment comparison is scant. Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared cabazitaxel vs. Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients regarding progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed 2 nd to 4 th line mCRPC patients to approximate current Phase-III patient selection criteria. Results: Of 373 mCRPC patients, 14% received cabazitaxel vs. 65% Lu-PSMA vs. 21% both. Patients undergoing Lu-PSMA therapy were significantly older (median 72 vs. 66 years, p&lt;0.01) and displayed a higher proportion of ECOG ≥2 (12 vs. 5.0%, p=0.1), relative to cabazitaxel patients. Rates of PSA50 were 32% vs. 0% for Lu-PSMA vs. cabazitaxel. In outcome analyses, significant superior median PFS was observed for Lu-PSMA vs. cabazitaxel (13.4 vs. 7.1 months, p&lt;0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.38, p&lt;0.001). Regarding OS, rates also significantly differed with median OS of 14.7 vs. 16.5 vs. 29.6 months for cabazitaxel vs. Lu-PSMA vs. both treatments (p&lt;0.01). In sensitivity analyses of 2 nd to 4 th line mCRPC, PFS rates and median OS rates for cabazitaxel vs. Lu-PSMA vs. both therapies qualitatively remained the same compared to the entire cohort. Conclusions: In real-world setting, Lu-PSMA provides significantly better PFS and qualitatively better OS rates compared to cabazitaxel chemotherapy and should therefore be considered as a valuable treatment option for advanced mCRPC patients according to the EMA-approval. Characteristics of 296 metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients stratified according to treatment of cabazitaxel vs. 177 - Lutetium- prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (Lu-PSMA). Characteristic N Overall,N = 296 1 CabazitaxelN = 52 (18%) 1 Lu-PSMA,N = 244 (82%) 1 p-value 2 Age at mCRPC, years 192 71 (64, 76) 66 (58, 71) 72 (66, 78) &lt;0.001 PSA at m CRPC, ng/ml 141 18 (6, 72) 63 (12, 144) 15 (6, 64) 0.044 Number of CRPC lines 296 3 (2, 4) 4 (3, 5) 3 (2, 4) &lt;0.001 Cycles systemic treatment 229 3 (2, 6) 5 (3, 6) 3 (2, 6) 0.031 PSA response, % 39 20 (0, 66) 15 (0, 23) 25 (0, 68) 0.3 PSA50 39 11 (28%) 0 (0%) 11 (32%) 0.3 PSA90 39 5 (13%) 0 (0%) 5 (15%) 0.9 ECOG status at mCRPC 109 0.10 0 52 (48%) 14 (70%) 38 (43%) 1 45 (41%) 5 (25%) 40 (45%) &gt;=2 12 (11%) 1 (5%) 11 (12%) Cardiovascular disease 183 <jats:td colsp

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Martini-Klinik (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.