Defining subgroups of patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer for whom active surveillance is safe.

393 Background: A number of guideline groups recommend active surveillance (AS) for patients with low risk prostate cancer as well as selected patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC) – these groups are not well defined. Our group has previously shown that some patients with IRPC have high rates of progression to advanced disease. The goal of this study was to determine a subset of patients with IRPC where AS is safe. Methods: This single-institution, phase II study enrolled men with low-risk and selected IRPC patients since 1995. Patients were followed with PSA every 3-6 months, DRE every 6 months with repeat systematic biopsies at 1 year and every 3 years. Since 2013, MRI staging was done every 2 years with targeted and systematic biopsies done for new or growing lesions. Patients were followed until death or withdrawn consent. Time to treatment, metastasis-free survival (MFS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival were calculated from date of registration biopsy. Results: 1409 men were analyzed with a median follow-up of 11.0 years (range 1.2 – 26.4 years). Median age and PSA at registration biopsy were 67 years and 5.03 ng/ml. 86.4%, 11.8% and 1.7% had GG1, GG2 and GG3 disease. 72.9%, 5.8%, 7.3% and 13.6% had low, GG1 favourable IRPC (FIR), GG2 FIR and unfavourable risk ds (UIR). 996 men had at least one repeat biopsy, 768 reclassified, 604 underwent treatment, 166 had biochemical failure, 64 developed metastases and 41 died of prostate cancer. 10 year MFS was 97.4%. Absolute percentage pattern 4/5 (APP4) at baseline had a sensitivity of 36%, specificity of 86% and AUC of 64% with an optimal cutpoint of >0.30 for predicting MFS. Multivariable analysis (MVA) revealed APP4 (HR 2.86) at baseline and at repeat biopsy (vs baseline) of high risk vs UIR (HR 5.61) and high risk vs GG2 FIR (HR 10.4) were independent predictors of MFS. 10 year CSS was 98.5%. MVA revealed APP4 (>0.7, AUC 67%; HR 3.13) and high risk vs UIR (HR 34.4) were independent predictors of CSS. Conclusions: Patients with GG1 prostate cancer and those with GG2 FIR and APP4 < 0.30 appear to have very low risk of metastases and prostate cancer death and are suitable for active surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.393
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining subgroups of patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer for whom active surveillance is safe.

Stanley K. Liu, Meghan Kulasingham-Poon, Andrew Loblaw, Alexandre Mamedov et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Defining subgroups of patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer for whom active surveillance is safe.

Stanley K. Liu, Meghan Kulasingham-Poon, Andrew Loblaw, Alexandre Mamedov, Hon S. Leong, Laurence Klotz, Danny Vesprini, Ruben Del Castillo, Liying Zhang, Zaid Sadiq, Mona Beera
article en

Abstract

393 Background: A number of guideline groups recommend active surveillance (AS) for patients with low risk prostate cancer as well as selected patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC) – these groups are not well defined. Our group has previously shown that some patients with IRPC have high rates of progression to advanced disease. The goal of this study was to determine a subset of patients with IRPC where AS is safe. Methods: This single-institution, phase II study enrolled men with low-risk and selected IRPC patients since 1995. Patients were followed with PSA every 3-6 months, DRE every 6 months with repeat systematic biopsies at 1 year and every 3 years. Since 2013, MRI staging was done every 2 years with targeted and systematic biopsies done for new or growing lesions. Patients were followed until death or withdrawn consent. Time to treatment, metastasis-free survival (MFS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival were calculated from date of registration biopsy. Results: 1409 men were analyzed with a median follow-up of 11.0 years (range 1.2 – 26.4 years). Median age and PSA at registration biopsy were 67 years and 5.03 ng/ml. 86.4%, 11.8% and 1.7% had GG1, GG2 and GG3 disease. 72.9%, 5.8%, 7.3% and 13.6% had low, GG1 favourable IRPC (FIR), GG2 FIR and unfavourable risk ds (UIR). 996 men had at least one repeat biopsy, 768 reclassified, 604 underwent treatment, 166 had biochemical failure, 64 developed metastases and 41 died of prostate cancer. 10 year MFS was 97.4%. Absolute percentage pattern 4/5 (APP4) at baseline had a sensitivity of 36%, specificity of 86% and AUC of 64% with an optimal cutpoint of >0.30 for predicting MFS. Multivariable analysis (MVA) revealed APP4 (HR 2.86) at baseline and at repeat biopsy (vs baseline) of high risk vs UIR (HR 5.61) and high risk vs GG2 FIR (HR 10.4) were independent predictors of MFS. 10 year CSS was 98.5%. MVA revealed APP4 (>0.7, AUC 67%; HR 3.13) and high risk vs UIR (HR 34.4) were independent predictors of CSS. Conclusions: Patients with GG1 prostate cancer and those with GG2 FIR and APP4 < 0.30 appear to have very low risk of metastases and prostate cancer death and are suitable for active surveillance.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Sunnybrook Hospital (CA), Sunnybrook Research Institute
Sunnybrook Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.