Evaluation of MIR-371A-3P for clinical implementation in a CLIA-certified laboratory.

648 Background: MicroRNAs (mi-RNAs) have emerged as promising biomarkers for the detection of viable germ cell tumors (GCT). Our previous work in a research lab demonstrated optimal performance with positive results that had Cq values less than 28, an indeterminate range between 28-35 and negative results greater than 35. In this study, we assessed performance characteristics of miR-371a-3p in a CLIA certified lab at UCSD. Methods: Due to workflows, equipment and scaling, several modifications were required from our original research protocol. Ultimately, serum samples from 53 cases and 139 controls were analyzed using qPCR for miR-371a-3p in the CLIA lab. Initial runs and re-runs were conducted for the indeterminate samples. Metrics used for calculation of performance were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), area under the curve (AUC) and Youden’s index. Results: We used two analytic pipelines for classifying positive and negative Cq values: 1) a binary cutoff of 26.9 and, 2) an indeterminate range of 25.6 to 31.5. Using the binary cutoff, a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 98%, PPV of 94%, NPV of 95%, AUC of 0.94 and Youden index of 0.85 was observed. In contrast, initial runs on the indeterminate ranges yielded a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 99%, PPV of 97%, NPV of 98%, AUC of 0.97 and Youden index of 0.94. However, 36% (51 of 139) controls fell into the indeterminate range. Re-runs on these samples demonstrated similar findings. Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that there are likely lab specific, protocol specific and disease-state specific analytics and thresholding for circulating miR-371a-3p testing. These factors will need to be carefully considered while moving towards clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.648
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of MIR-371A-3P for clinical implementation in a CLIA-certified laboratory.

Thomas Gerald, Jin Piao, Bendu Konneh, Jeffrey Howard et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Evaluation of MIR-371A-3P for clinical implementation in a CLIA-certified laboratory.

Thomas Gerald, Jin Piao, Bendu Konneh, Jeffrey Howard, John T. Lafin, Nicholas Coleman, Armon Amini, Michelle M. Nuño, Cinzia G. Scarpini, Aditya Bagrodia, A. Lindsay Frazier, Matthew Jonathan Murray, Melis Gür, Sarah Murray, Kshitij Pandit
article en

Abstract

648 Background: MicroRNAs (mi-RNAs) have emerged as promising biomarkers for the detection of viable germ cell tumors (GCT). Our previous work in a research lab demonstrated optimal performance with positive results that had Cq values less than 28, an indeterminate range between 28-35 and negative results greater than 35. In this study, we assessed performance characteristics of miR-371a-3p in a CLIA certified lab at UCSD. Methods: Due to workflows, equipment and scaling, several modifications were required from our original research protocol. Ultimately, serum samples from 53 cases and 139 controls were analyzed using qPCR for miR-371a-3p in the CLIA lab. Initial runs and re-runs were conducted for the indeterminate samples. Metrics used for calculation of performance were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), area under the curve (AUC) and Youden’s index. Results: We used two analytic pipelines for classifying positive and negative Cq values: 1) a binary cutoff of 26.9 and, 2) an indeterminate range of 25.6 to 31.5. Using the binary cutoff, a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 98%, PPV of 94%, NPV of 95%, AUC of 0.94 and Youden index of 0.85 was observed. In contrast, initial runs on the indeterminate ranges yielded a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 99%, PPV of 97%, NPV of 98%, AUC of 0.97 and Youden index of 0.94. However, 36% (51 of 139) controls fell into the indeterminate range. Re-runs on these samples demonstrated similar findings. Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that there are likely lab specific, protocol specific and disease-state specific analytics and thresholding for circulating miR-371a-3p testing. These factors will need to be carefully considered while moving towards clinical implementation.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
University of Southern California (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of California San Diego (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.