Implementing precision oncology in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Prospective identification of clinical, tissue-based, and circulating factors to refine outcome prediction and support therapeutic choices (SIGNS-RCC TRIAL).

TPS617 Background: At diagnosis, 55% of RCC are localized, and 25% are locally advanced/metastatic (aRCC); an additional 30% develop metastases during follow-up. Prognosis is highly variable in both resectable and advanced disease. All patients’ stratification tools are based on clinical risk scores. For resected patients, only pembrolizumab has demonstrated OS benefit in the adjuvant setting. For metastatic disease, first-line combos (IO-IO and IO-TKI) have dramatically improved outcomes in intermediate/poor-risk patients but have shown no additional OS benefit over TKI in good-risk patients. Methods: We designed a multicentric trial to identify novel prognostic/predictive biomarkers to refine current therapeutic algorithms for systemic therapy in both early-stage and aRCC in three different cohorts of patients. Cohort (A) includes patients who underwent radical surgery for RCC (resected, rRCC). Cohort (B) is a retrospective cohort that reclutes aRCC treated with VEGFR TKI monotherapy in I line. The prospective cohort (C) enrolls aRCC patients who are candidate to receive current I-line IO-TKI combos. In the first part, we will correlate patient- and tumor-related factors with the risk of recurrence after surgery for rRCC and progression-free survival and overall survival for aRCC. Tissue-based signatures will be obtained using IHC (PD-L1 expression, tumor immune microenvironment - TiME - composition), an NGS custom panel (mutational profiling), and FISH (for recurrent RCC alterations, such as 9p loss). Multiplex IHC and RNA-ISH will assess cytokine production by specific TiME components. Correlations between the obtained signatures and clinical outcomes will be calculated. In cohort C, the prognostic role of circulating factors (serum cytokine levels and mononuclear cell subpopulations, focusing on MDSC and TReg) will also be evaluated in addition to clinical and tissue-based factors. Blood samples will be collected before and during I-line treatment at pre-planned timepoints. Biomarkers will be quantitatively analyzed to evaluate their relationship with outcomes. Enrollment is ongoing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.tps617
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing precision oncology in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Prospective identification of clinical, tissue-based, and circulating factors to refine outcome prediction and support therapeutic choices (SIGNS-RCC TRIAL).

Stefano Manduca, Francesco Pierantoni, Davide Bimbatti, Ilaria Zampiva et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Implementing precision oncology in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Prospective identification of clinical, tissue-based, and circulating factors to refine outcome prediction and support therapeutic choices (SIGNS-RCC TRIAL).

Stefano Manduca, Francesco Pierantoni, Davide Bimbatti, Ilaria Zampiva, Matteo Brunelli, Anna Caliò, Jessica Menis, Veronica Mollica, Emanuela Fantinel, Michele Stanislaw Milella, Francesca Bertolotti, Andrea Marchetti, Michela Piacentini, Cecilia Nasso, Guido Martignoni, Roberta Vesentini, Giuseppe Verlato, Matteo Rosellini, Pierpaolo Marchetti, Sara Elena Rebuzzi
article en

Abstract

TPS617 Background: At diagnosis, 55% of RCC are localized, and 25% are locally advanced/metastatic (aRCC); an additional 30% develop metastases during follow-up. Prognosis is highly variable in both resectable and advanced disease. All patients’ stratification tools are based on clinical risk scores. For resected patients, only pembrolizumab has demonstrated OS benefit in the adjuvant setting. For metastatic disease, first-line combos (IO-IO and IO-TKI) have dramatically improved outcomes in intermediate/poor-risk patients but have shown no additional OS benefit over TKI in good-risk patients. Methods: We designed a multicentric trial to identify novel prognostic/predictive biomarkers to refine current therapeutic algorithms for systemic therapy in both early-stage and aRCC in three different cohorts of patients. Cohort (A) includes patients who underwent radical surgery for RCC (resected, rRCC). Cohort (B) is a retrospective cohort that reclutes aRCC treated with VEGFR TKI monotherapy in I line. The prospective cohort (C) enrolls aRCC patients who are candidate to receive current I-line IO-TKI combos. In the first part, we will correlate patient- and tumor-related factors with the risk of recurrence after surgery for rRCC and progression-free survival and overall survival for aRCC. Tissue-based signatures will be obtained using IHC (PD-L1 expression, tumor immune microenvironment - TiME - composition), an NGS custom panel (mutational profiling), and FISH (for recurrent RCC alterations, such as 9p loss). Multiplex IHC and RNA-ISH will assess cytokine production by specific TiME components. Correlations between the obtained signatures and clinical outcomes will be calculated. In cohort C, the prognostic role of circulating factors (serum cytokine levels and mononuclear cell subpopulations, focusing on MDSC and TReg) will also be evaluated in addition to clinical and tissue-based factors. Blood samples will be collected before and during I-line treatment at pre-planned timepoints. Biomarkers will be quantitatively analyzed to evaluate their relationship with outcomes. Enrollment is ongoing.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
University of Verona (IT), Ospedale San Paolo (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Ospedale Santa Corona (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.